NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1983 › Size of Units in Representation Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1983

Size of Units in Representation Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1983

printed as Table 17 · source pages 228–229 · nlrb1983_p0228_t0

Stitched from pp. 228–229.

Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalElections in which representation rights were won byElections in which no representative was chosen
Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative was chosen
Size of unit (number of employees)Number eligible to voteTotal electionsPercent of totalCumulative percent of totalNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size classNumberPercent by size class
A. Certification elections (RC and RM)
Total RC and RM elections171,5483,483100.0982100.0442100.057100.0182100.01,820100.0
Under 104,64183624.024.023724.117539.61322.83117.038020.9
10 to 1911,08780123.047.023323.712027.1915.83820.940122.0
20 to 2910,73844812.959.913814.14610.4814.02815.422812.5
30 to 3910,1092958.568.4818.2296.658.8158.21659.1
40 to 498,4321915.573.9464.7184.135.263.31186.5
50 to 599,1441694.978.8545.661.423.5137.2945.2
60 to 697,8251223.582.3404.171.511.842.2703.8
70 to 796,876922.684.9232.392.023.542.2543.0
80 to 896,570782.287.1181.961.447.052.7452.4
90 to 994,600491.488.5131.320.511.821.1311.7
100 to 1095,210501.489.9181.930.735.221.1241.3
110 to 1194,441391.191.0101.010.2052.7231.3
120 to 1294,577371.192.180.830.7031.7231.3
130 to 1393,909290.892.9101.010.211.831.7140.8
140 to 1494,296300.993.8121.220.5021.1140.8
150 to 1593,863250.794.550.520.5031.7150.8
160 to 1692,465150.494.910.110.2031.7100.5
170 to 1793,133180.595.420.210.200150.8
180 to 1891,836100.395.710.110.2010.570.4
190 to 1992,139110.396.030.300080.4
200 to 29917,756742.198.1171.751.1042.2482.6
300 to 3998,957260.898.950.520.535.221.1140.8
400 to 4996,257140.499.320.210.211.821.180.4
500 to 5996,027110.399.630.310.2010.560.3
600 to 7991,25020.199.70011.8010.1
800 to 9992,70530.199.810.10010.510.1
1,000 to 1,99910,01270.2100.010.10031.730.2
2,000 to 2,9992,69310.0100.000010.50
B Decertification elections (RD)
Total RD elections38,370922100.0159100.055100.05100.013100.0690100.0
Under 101,53529131.631.6148.81323.60323.126137.8
10 to 192,95321323.154.73018.91934.6240.0215.416023.2
20 to 292,94212213.267.92314.5610.9120.0430.78812.8
30 to 392,386697.575.41610.1610.9120.00466.7
40 to 491,814414.479.8138.223.600263.8
50 to 591,726323.583.385.047.400202.9
60 to 691,943303.386.6106.323.60215.4162.3
70 to 791,115151.688.263.700091.3
80 to 891,695202.290.463.711.8017.7121.7
90 to 991,124121.391.742.511.80071.0
100 to 10963060.792.410.60120.0040.6
110 to 11945740.492.821.300020.3
120 to 12962850.593.342.500010.1
130 to 13926420.293.521.30000
140 to 14957640.493.921.300020.3
150 to 15930920.294.121.30000
160 to 16999560.794.810.611.8017.730.4
170 to 1992,037111.296.00000111.6
200 to 2994,322182.098.074.4000111.6
300 to 4995,427141.599.542.5000101.5
500 to 7992,50440.499.931.900010.1
800 and over98810.1100.010.60000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See glossary for definition of terms

290 of 290 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 228. Decimal points: this 1-bit scan drops the printed decimal point in every percentage cell, so the page renders them as "100 0", "24 0", "39 6", etc. They are transcribed with the point restored ("100.0", "24.0", "39.6"); the same applies to the period after the section letter, printed as "A Certification elections (RC and RM)" and transcribed as "A. Certification elections (RC and RM)". No digits were changed. Row label "400 to 499" is rendered by the scan as "4C0 to 499"; the damaged character is a zero (confirmed by the surrounding sequence 300 to 399 / 400 to 499 / 500 to 599). Arithmetic checks all pass, which anchors the integer columns: in every data row the five "Number" cells sum exactly to "Total elections"; the column totals in the "Total RC and RM elections" row (982 + 442 + 57 + 182 + 1,820) sum to 3,483; and the "Number eligible to vote" column sums to exactly 171,548, the printed total. The cumulative-percent column is also an exact running sum of the percent-of-total column. A few printed percentages differ by one unit in the last place from the ratio they represent; they are transcribed as printed, not corrected: AFL-CIO "5.6" for 54 of 982 and "1.9" for 18 of 982 (rows "50 to 59", "80 to 89", "100 to 109"); Teamsters "1.5" for 7 of 442 (row "60 to 69"); Other national unions "5.2" for 3 of 57 (rows "40 to 49", "100 to 109", "300 to 399"); Other local unions "7.2" for 13 of 182 (row "50 to 59") and "1.7" for 3 of 182 (several rows); no-representative "2.4" for 45 of 1,820 (row "80 to 89"). Of these the most doubtful single reading is the Teamsters percent in row "60 to 69", where the degraded glyph could be 1.6 rather than 1.5. The "Total RC and RM elections" row has no value printed in the "Cumulative percent of total" column; it is left empty. Percent cells are blank wherever the corresponding count is 0. There is a small stray speck of toner in the left margin of the last column ("Percent by size class" under "Elections in which no representative was chosen") in row "100 to 109", just before "1.3"; it is page dirt, not a minus sign or footnote marker. The crop shows only panel A (certification elections); the table's panel B continues beyond this image. No footnotes are printed within the crop.

p. 229. Crop is the continuation page of Table 17 (panel B only); panel A is on the preceding page, so the "Total RD elections" line here is the panel total, not a table total. Decimal points: this is a 1-bit scan in which the small decimal-point glyph is dropped almost everywhere, so percentages print as e.g. "31 6", "100 0", "8 8". I have transcribed them with the decimal point restored ("31.6", "100.0", "8.8"), since that is unambiguously the printed value — digit-grouping commas in the "Number eligible to vote" column did survive the scan and are transcribed as printed. No value was otherwise altered. Section line: the stub reads "B" followed by a wide gap and "Decertification elections (RD)". A period after the "B" (matching the usual "A."/"B." sectioning in this table) is not visible in the scan; I transcribed it without one. Footnote: terminal punctuation after "terms" is not legible, so the footnote is given without a closing period. Blank vs. zero: in the four union-group panels many "Percent by size class" cells are blank beside a printed "0" in the adjacent Number column (e.g. "Under 10" / Other national unions, "30 to 39" / Other local unions); these are left as "" per the printed page. Likewise the "Percent by size class" cell under "Elections in which no representative was chosen" is blank for "130 to 139", "150 to 159" and "800 and over", where the Number is 0. The "Cumulative percent of total" cell on the "Total RD elections" row is blank as printed. Arithmetic checks (not corrections): every column foots to its printed total — Number eligible to vote sums to 38,370; Total elections to 922; AFL-CIO 159; Teamsters 55; Other national 5; Other local 13; no representative 690. Each "Percent by size class" column sums to 100.0, and the running sum of "Percent of total" reproduces the printed cumulative column exactly. No misprints detected. A small stray ink mark sits in the body of the "Elections in which no representative was chosen" column just above the "Total RD elections" row; it is not a value and is not transcribed.

Source image

Source page 228 of NLRB FY1983 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1983, p. 228.
Source page 229 of NLRB FY1983 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1983, p. 229.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.