Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1983

p. 184. Four printed columns: stub, "Cases in which formal actions taken", and the two case-type columns AC and UC under the spanner "Formal actions taken by type of case". Two stub lines carry no figures and are transcribed as label-only rows: "Review of regional directors' decisions" (printed at a shallower indent than the items below it, with 12 / 1 / 9 belonging to the indented line "Requests for review received") and "Regional directors' decisions" (heading over Affirmed / Modified / Reversed). Internal arithmetic as printed does not reconcile across columns: AC + UC does not equal the "Cases in which formal actions taken" figure for most rows — Hearings completed 5 + 93 = 98 vs 105; Decision issued after hearing 5 + 100 = 105 vs 117; By regional directors 5 + 100 = 105 vs 110; Requests for review received 1 + 9 = 10 vs 12; Board action on requests ruled upon, total 3 + 6 = 9 vs 12; Denied 1 + 3 = 4 vs 8; and Remanded 1 + 1 = 2 exceeds the printed total of 1. Column-wise the detail does sum correctly (Granted + Denied + Remanded = 12 / 3 / 6, matching the "Board action on requests ruled upon, total" row), so the figures are transcribed exactly as printed without correction. The scan renders many lowercase "i" glyphs without their dots (e.g. "Hearings", "decisions", "Denied"); these are reproduced as normal spellings. The footnote under the table ends without a period, as printed.