NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1982 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1982 and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1982

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1982 and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1982

printed as Table 19 · source page 325 · nlrb1982_p0325_t0

Fiscal year 1982July 5, 1935 to Sept. 30, 1982
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1935 to Sept. 30, 1982
TotalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals45640830315
On petitions for review and/or enforcement42438026315100.0100.0100.0100.08,569100.0
Board orders affirmed in full2732391821462.969.366.793.35,44963.6
Board orders affirmed with modification454410011.63.81,30715.3
Remanded to Board33284107.315.433.34064.7
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded20191005.03.81511.7
Board orders set aside535020113.27.76.71,25614.7
On petitions for contempt3228400100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition before court order5500017.9
Court orders holding respondent in contempt191540053.6100.0
Court orders directing compliance without contempt adjudication6600021.4
Contempt petitions withdrawn without compliance00000
Court orders denying petition220007.1
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court32100100.0100.0234100.0
Board orders affirmed in full32100100.0100.014160.3
Board orders affirmed with modification00000177.3
Board orders set aside000003816.2
Remanded to Board00000198.2
Remanded to court of appeals00000166.8
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied0000010.4
Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals0000010.4
Contempt cases enforced0000010.4

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See Glossary for definitions of terms.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 The Board appeared as "amicus curiae" in two cases.

53 of 62 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 325. The scan is a 1-bit bitonal image in which small round marks are systematically dropped: the dots over lowercase i's are missing throughout (e.g. "Fiscal", "unions", "dismissal" all print dotless), and likewise most periods. Decimal points in the Percentages and Percent columns therefore do not render (the image shows "100 0", "62 9", "15 4", etc.); I have transcribed them with the decimal point, i.e. 100.0, 62.9, 15.4. The same restoration was applied to abbreviation periods in "U.S. courts of appeals", "U.S. Supreme Court", "Vs." in the column headings, and "Sept. 30, 1982" in the spanner, and to sentence periods in the footnotes. No digits were altered. All arithmetic is internally consistent, which supports the column assignments: FY1982 "On petitions for review and/or enforcement" subrows sum to 424/380/26/3/15 and each percentage column sums to 100.0; the contempt subrows sum to 32/28/4; the cumulative column sums to 8,569 (63.6+15.3+4.7+1.7+14.7 = 100.0) and 234 for the Supreme Court block (percentages sum to 100.0). The two top rows, 456 = 424 + 32 and 408 = 380 + 28, also check. Cells left empty on purpose: the two cumulative columns on the "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals", "On petitions for contempt" and all five contempt subrows; the "Vs. both employers and unions" and "Board dismissal" percentage columns wherever no figure is printed. Several of those blanks carry a stray faint dot (e.g. percentage "Vs. both employers and unions" on "Board orders set aside"; "Vs. employers only" on "Contempt petitions withdrawn without compliance", "Board orders set aside" and "Contempt cases enforced" in the Supreme Court block); these are leader-dot or speck artifacts, not values, and are transcribed as empty. The stub column has no printed heading, so cell 0 of each heading level is empty. Row labels that wrap in print were joined and the end-of-line hyphens repaired: "Board orders partially affirmed and partially remand-ed", "Court orders directing compliance without contempt adjudication", and "Board's request for remand or modification of enforce-ment order denied".

Source image

Source page 325 of NLRB FY1982 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1982, p. 325.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.