NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1981 › Proceedings Decided by Circuit Courts of Appeals on Petitions for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1981, Compared With 5-Year Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1976 Through 1980

Proceedings Decided by Circuit Courts of Appeals on Petitions for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1981, Compared With 5-Year Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1976 Through 1980

printed as Table 19A · source page 236 · nlrb1981_p0236_t0

Circuit courts of appeals (headquarters)Total fiscal year 1981Total fiscal years 1976-1980Affirmed in fullModifiedRemanded in fullAffirmed in part and remanded in partSet aside
Circuit courts of appeals (headquarters)Total fiscal year 1981Total fiscal years 1976-1980Fiscal Year 1981Cumulative fiscal years 1976-1980Fiscal Year 1981Cumulative fiscal years 1976-1980Fiscal Year 1981Cumulative fiscal years 1976-1980Fiscal Year 1981Cumulative fiscal years 1976-1980Fiscal Year 1981Cumulative fiscal years 1976-1980
Circuit courts of appeals (headquarters)Total fiscal year 1981Total fiscal years 1976-1980NumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent
Total all circuits4791,65330663.91,10466.86714.018411.1296.0865.2112.3311.96613.824815.0
1 Boston, Mass26821973.15263.4519.21315.8033.7033.727.71113.4
2 New York, N Y271401866.79165.0518.51712.113.775.0042.9311.12115.0
3 Philadelphia, Pa541443666.610170.135.61510.447.4107.035.610.7814.81711.8
4 Richmond, Va421072150.07065.4819.01614.912.487.5021.91228.61110.3
5 New Orleans, La.552273563.715267.0610.93214.123.683.523.652.21018.23013.2
6 Cincinnati, Ohio801985062.513367.21417.5157.633.794.5042.01316.33718.7
7 Chicago, Ill301751446.710560.0723.32614.90105.7010.5930.03318.9
8 St Louis, Mo301192273.37966.4413.41613.513.310.8032.5310.02016.8
9 San Francisco, Calif903106066.722171.31112.2216.81213.3185.822.231.055.64715.1
10. Denver, Colo17581270.63560.315.9712.1317.635.215.923.401119.0
Washington, D C.28931967.96569.9310.766.427.199.7310.733.213.61010.8

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 Percentages are computed horizontally by current fiscal year and total fiscal years

135 of 135 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 236. 23 columns: stub, two total columns, then five outcome groups of four columns each (Number/Percent for FY 1981 and for cumulative FY 1976-1980). DECIMAL POINTS IN PERCENT COLUMNS: this 1-bit scan drops most decimal points, so nearly every percent prints as e.g. \"63 9\", \"14 0\". A few cells retain a visible dot (San Francisco Modified cumulative \"6.8\", Richmond Set aside cumulative \"10.3\", San Francisco Affirmed-in-part FY1981 \"2.2\"), and every value is consistent with one decimal place, so all percent cells are transcribed with a decimal point. No other normalization was applied. BLANK PERCENTS: wherever a Number cell is 0 the matching Percent cell is left blank in the original; recorded as \"\". STRAY MARK: Richmond, Va, column \"Affirmed in part and remanded in part / Fiscal Year 1981 / Percent\" contains only a lone dot (its Number is 0); recorded as \"\". VERIFICATION: all ten count columns sum exactly to the printed \"Total all circuits\" row (479; 1,653; 306; 1,104; 67; 184; 29; 86; 11; 31; 66; 248), which confirms the column assignment of every integer. SUSPECTED MISPRINTS (transcribed as printed, not corrected) — printed percent disagrees with the horizontal computation the footnote describes: - Philadelphia, Pa, Affirmed in full / Fiscal Year 1981 / Percent: printed 66.6; 36/54 = 66.7. - New Orleans, La., Affirmed in full / Fiscal Year 1981 / Percent: printed 63.7; 35/55 = 63.6. - St Louis, Mo, Modified / Fiscal Year 1981 / Percent: printed 13.4; 4/30 = 13.3. - St Louis, Mo, Modified / Cumulative / Percent: printed 13.5; 16/119 = 13.4. The final digits of these four cells are the least certain readings in the table; elsewhere the table rounds inconsistently (it truncates in several places, e.g. Boston Modified cumulative 15.8 from 15.85), so arithmetic was not used to override what is printed. ROW LABELS: periods after abbreviations (Mass., N.Y., Pa., Va., Ill., St., Mo., Calif., Colo., D.C.) are largely lost in the scan and are transcribed only where legible; \"10.\" is the only row number with a visible period. The last row, Washington, D C., carries no circuit number in the original. Trailing leader dots were dropped per instruction. TYPOGRAPHY: the scan renders many dotless i's (\"Affirmed ın full\", \"Cıncınnatı\", \"Rıchmond\"); these are ordinary i's and are written as such.

Source image

Source page 236 of NLRB FY1981 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1981, p. 236.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.