NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1978 › Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1978

Final Outcome of Representation Elections in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1978

printed as Table 13 · source pages 279–281 · nlrb1978_p0279_t0

Stitched from pp. 279–281.

Participating unionsTotal electionsElections won by unionsElections in which no representative chosenEmployees eligible to voteIn elections where no representative chosen
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonIn units won byOther local unionsIn elections where no representative chosen
Participating unionsTotal electionsPercent wonTotal wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsElections in which no representative chosenTotalIn elections wonAFL-CIO unionsTeamstersOther national unionsOther local unionsIn elections where no representative chosen
A. All representation elections
AFL-CIO4,57744.72,0472,0472,530265,77985,51085,510180,269
Teamsters2,49542.01,0491,0491,44685,49128,09128,09157,400
Other national unions43347.320520522836,66214,47114,47122,191
Other local unions32155.817917914223,48610,81410,81412,672
1-union elections7,82644.53,4802,0471,0492051794,346411,418138,88685,51028,09114,47110,814272,532
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO10164.465653615,1984,2074,20710,991
AFL-CIO v Teamsters9571.66828402711,8887,5203,0454,4754,368
AFL-CIO v national4479.53572896,2754,7837594,0241,492
AFL-CIO v local8082.56627391413,1229,8606,0243,8363,262
Teamsters v national1580.0125731,494952177775542
Teamsters v local1984.2168831,7171,5984631,135119
Teamsters v Teamsters425.0113138808058
National v local13100.0138505,1105,1102,8652,2450
National v national3100.03306868680
Local v local2085.0171732,3392,1362,136203
2-union elections39475.12961275446699857,34936,31414,0355,1957,7329,35221,035
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO10.0001207,00207
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v. Teamsters250.0110140828280380
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v national1100.0101035835803580
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v local683.35231780497232265283
AFL-CIO v Teamsters v local2100.020020633633006330
AFL-CIO v national v. local1100.010010176176001760
AFL-CIO v. local v local366.720211026806834
Teamsters v local v local1100.0110012512512500
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO1100.01101061061060
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v Teamsters v local1100.010100656506500
3 (or more) union elections2075.015421853,0522,0563661903581,142996
Total representation elections8,24046.03,7912,1781,1052522564,449471,819177,25699,91133,47622,56121,308294,563
B. Elections in RC cases
AFL-CIO3,90248.01,8721,8722,030235,82073,46773,467162,353
Teamsters2,19844.99889881,21078,08726,34026,34051,747
Other national unions39448.018918920533,77612,31412,31421,462
Other local unions29358.417117112222,88710,62810,62812,259
1-union elections6,78747.43,2201,8729881891713,567370,570122,74973,46726,34012,31410,628247,821
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO9663.561613515,1344,1454,14510,989
AFL-CIO v Teamsters8470.25927322510,7476,6802,8453,8354,067
AFL-CIO v national4178.03262695,6704,1786393,5391,492
AFL-CIO v local7681.6622438149,2876,0252,5513,4743,262
Teamsters v national1485.7125721,132952177775180
Teamsters v local1485.7125721,4731,3722831,089101
Teamsters v Teamsters333.311298808018
National v local12100.0128405,0825,0822,8652,2170
National v national3100.03306868680
Local v local2085.0171732,3392,1362,136203
2-union elections36374.72711184344669251,03030,71810,1804,3757,2478,91620,312
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO10.000120700207
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v. Teamsters250.0110140828280380
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v national1100.0101035835803580
AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v local683.35231780497232265283
AFL-CIO v Teamsters v local2100.020020633633006330
AFL-CIO v national v. local1100.010010176176001760
AFL-CIO v local v local366.720211026806834
Teamsters v local v local1100.0110012512512500
National v local v local10.000019200092
3 (or more) union elections1872.013311852,8811,8852601253581,142996
Total RC elections7,16848.93,5041,9931,0322342453,664424,481155,35283,90730,84019,91920,686269,129
C. Elections in RM cases
AFL-CIO17623.942421345,9491,5561,5564,393
Teamsters7028.62020501,5064594591,047
Other national unions650.0333107474760
Other local unions666.74429587878
1-union elections25826.7694220341897,6572,1491,55645947875,508
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO250.01114222
AFL-CIO v. Teamsters2100.0202016160160
AFL-CIO v. national1100.0101011110110
AFL-CIO v. local1100.0110055555500
Teamsters v. Teamsters10.0001400040
2-union elections771.452210212684571611042
Total RM elections26527.9744422441917,7832,2331,61347558875,550
D. Elections in RD cases
AFL-CIO49926.713313336624,01010,48710,48713,523
Teamsters22718.141411865,8981,2921,2924,606
Other national unions3339.41313202,7792,1102,110669
Other local unions2218.244185049999405
1-union elections78124.51911334113459033,19113,98810,4871,2922,1109919,203
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO3100.03306060600
AFL-CIO v. Teamsters977.871621,125824200624301
AFL-CIO v. national2100.021105945941204740
AFL-CIO v. local3100.032103,7803,7803,4183620
Teamsters v. national10.00001362000362
Teamsters v. local580.043112442261804618
National v. local1100.0101028280280
2-union elections2483.320791346,1935,5123,798804474436681
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO1100.01101061061060
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Teamsters v. local1100.010100656506500
3 (or more) union elections2100.021100017117110665000
Total RD elections80726.42131415114759439,55519,67114,3912,1612,58453519,884

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary for definitions of terms.
  2. 2 Includes each unit in which a choice

724 of 724 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 279. Crop is incomplete: the three-union block continues below "Teamsters v local v local" (no "3-union elections" subtotal and no section B are on this image), and the footnote texts for the markers 1 (caption) and 2 ("Total elections") are not printed on the crop, so `footnotes` is empty. "Percent won" column: the decimal point is printed but prints very faintly and drops out of the scan in most rows (they read "42 0", "47 3", "100 0", etc.). I transcribed every value with its decimal point; each one is confirmed by Total won / Total elections (e.g. 1,049/2,495 = 42.0; 2,047/4,577 = 44.7; 5/6 = 83.3). Row "AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO", column "Employees eligible to vote - Total": printed as "207," with a trailing comma. Transcribed as printed; it appears to be a misprint for 207 (0 in elections won + 207 in elections where no representative chosen = 207). A small raised speck/degree-like mark sits at the left edge of the "Total elections" column on the first printed line of the "AFL-CIO v AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO" row. I judged it stray ink rather than a footnote marker and did not transcribe it; a reader checking the original should confirm. Periods after "v" (versus) in the row labels print inconsistently in this scan - some rows show "v", some "v." - and I transcribed them as they appear. The presence or absence of the period in any given label should not be relied on; all of them are almost certainly "v." in the original. Header structure: the spanner rule for "In units won by" covers only the three columns AFL-CIO unions, Teamsters and Other national unions; the employees "Other local unions" column is printed outside that rule (its heading box runs up into the "In units won by" level), so header row 2 carries "Other local unions" in that position. By symmetry with the left half of the table that column nevertheless holds employees in units won by other local unions, and the subtotal rows confirm it (2-union: 14,035 + 5,195 + 7,732 + 9,352 = 36,314 = "In elections won"). Cells printed as dash rules were rendered as "". All printed totals and subtotals check out arithmetically: 1-union and 2-union rows sum correctly down every column, and Total won + no representative chosen = Total elections in every row.

p. 280. Continuation page: no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 16 columns, counted from the column rules; by their contents they are stub, total elections, percent won by unions, elections won by unions (total), then the four won-by breakdown columns (AFL-CIO, Teamsters, other national, other local), elections lost by unions, eligible voters, valid votes for unions (total), then the same four breakdown columns, and valid votes against participating unions. The crop is cut at both ends: it opens in the middle of panel A (the two rows shown precede the "3 (or more) union elections" subtotal and the "Total representation elections" line), and it stops after the "1-union elections" subtotal of panel C, so the rest of panel C and any later panels and footnotes are not on this image. Percent column: this 1-bit scan drops the decimal point in most of the percent cells, which print as "100 0", "46 0", "85 7" and so on; the point is clearly visible in a few ("78.0", "66.7", "26.7"), and the column is uniformly one decimal place, so I have written the decimal point in every cell of that column. No digits were changed. Doubtful cell: "3 (or more) union elections" in panel B, percent column, reads as "72.0" on the image, but 13 of 18 is 72.2, and every other percent in the table matches its own won/total ratio. Transcribed as it appears; it is either a misprint or a "2" that the scan has rendered as a "0". Section lines "B. Elections in RC cases" and "C. Elections in RM cases" are centred panel headings spanning the full width, entered with the label in the stub and empty value cells. The period after the letter is faint in the scan, as is the period in the "v." of several row labels, which is why the versus abbreviation appears inconsistently as "v" and "v." in the labels; I transcribed each as it reads. Cells carrying a dash rule ("-------") for not-applicable combinations are transcribed as empty strings, as instructed; printed zeros are kept as "0". There is a small stray mark at the left edge of the "44" cell (other national unions won) in the "2-union elections" row of panel B. I read it as scan dirt rather than a footnote marker, since no footnotes are printed on this crop, and did not transcribe it. The running head "Appendix" and the page number 267 are set vertically at the right edge and are excluded. Cross-checks: every component-to-total footing I could test reconciles, including the four won-by columns to elections won, won plus lost to total elections, the four vote columns to valid votes for unions, union votes plus votes against to eligible voters, and the 1-union, 2-union and 3-or-more subtotals to "Total RC elections" in all fifteen value columns.

p. 281. Sixteen columns: stub; Total elections^2; six columns under "Elections won by unions" (Percent won, Total won, AFL-CIO unions, Teamsters, Other national unions, Other local unions); "Elections in which no representative chosen"; six columns under "Employees eligible to vote" (Total, In elections won, then four under the spanning sub-heading "In units won by": AFL-CIO unions, Teamsters, Other national unions, Other local unions); and the final tall column "In elections where no representative chosen". The first seven rows continue section "C. Elections in RM cases" from the preceding page; no section heading for them is printed on this crop. The centred section line reads "D Elections in RD cases" on the scan; the period after "D" is faint and I have written "D. Elections in RD cases". Percent-won column: the decimal point is lost or very faint in the scan for several cells, which print as e.g. "50 0", "100 0", "0 0", "71 4", "18 1", "18 2", "24 5", "77 8", "80 0", "83 3". The column is uniformly one-decimal (other cells show "27.9", "26.7", "39.4", "100.0", "26.4" clearly), so I transcribed all of them with the decimal point. Likewise the period in the paired-union labels ("AFL-CIO v. Teamsters") drops out of the scan on several lines; I used "v." throughout. Dash rules ("------") in empty cells are transcribed as "". Internal arithmetic (subtotals, the Total RM and Total RD lines, and employees-in-units-won summing to employees-in-elections-won) checks out in every row, which supports the column assignments. Footnote 2 is cut off by the bottom edge of the crop: only the top halves of the letters of its first line are visible and the rest of the footnote is not on the image. I transcribed only the opening words I could read with confidence ("Includes each unit in which a choice"); the footnote string in `footnotes` is therefore incomplete, not a full footnote.

Source image

Source page 279 of NLRB FY1978 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1978, p. 279.
Source page 280 of NLRB FY1978 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1978, p. 280.
Source page 281 of NLRB FY1978 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1978, p. 281.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.