NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1977 › Miscellaneous Litigation Involving NLRB; Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decision Issued in Fiscal Year 1977
| Type of litigation | Number of proceedings | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of litigation | Total—all courts | In courts of appeals | In district courts | ||||||
| Type of litigation | Number decided | Court determination | Number decided | Court determination | Number decided | Court determination | |||
| Type of litigation | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position |
| Totals—all types | 63 | 55 | 8 | 28 | 26 | 2 | 35 | 29 | 6 |
| NLRB-initiated actions or interventions | 11 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 1 |
| To enforce subpena | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| To restrain dissipation of assets by respondent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To defend Board's jurisdiction | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| To lift bankruptcy stay | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Action by other parties | 52 | 45 | 7 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 26 | 21 | 5 |
| To review 10(k) determination | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To restrain NLRB from | 19 | 17 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 2 |
| Proceeding in R case | 14 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 2 |
| Proceeding in unfair labor practice case | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Proceeding in backpay case | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeding in 10(k) case | |||||||||
| To compel NLRB to | 32 | 27 | 5 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 |
| Issue complaint | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Seek injunction | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Take action in R case | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Comply with Freedom of Information Act | 19 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 |
| To take action in backpay case | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
105 of 105 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 327. Ten columns: stub plus three panels of three (Total—all courts, In courts of appeals, In district courts), each panel being Number decided / Court determination: Upholding Board position / Contrary to Board position. "Number decided" is a tall heading spanning the two lower heading levels; "Type of litigation" spans all four. The scan is degraded in places and a few letters drop out of the headings: the "In courts of appeals" panel's "Upholding" reads like "Upolding" and the "Total—all courts" panel's "position" like "pcsition"; several "i" characters lose their dots (e.g. "determination", "NLRB-initiated", "dissipation"). I have transcribed these as the intended standard spellings rather than as the damaged glyphs. "To enforce subpena" is spelled that way in the original (not "subpoena"). The row "Proceeding in 10(k) case" is printed with dotted leaders and dash rules in all nine value columns, i.e. no values, so every cell is empty. The last row is printed "To take action in backpay case", with a leading "To" that the other sub-items under "To compel NLRB to" do not have; kept as printed. The raised 1 after "Comply with Freedom of Information Act" is the footnote marker. All printed subtotals and totals add up internally (sub-items sum to their section lines, sections sum to "Totals—all types", and the appeals plus district columns sum to the total-all-courts columns), so no misprints are suspected among the numbers. A vertical fragment of the running head is visible in the right margin outside the table rule; it is not part of the table.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.