NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1977 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1977; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1977

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1977; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1977

printed as Table 19 · source page 324 · nlrb1977_p0324_t0

Fiscal year 1977July 5, 1935-Sept. 30, 1977
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1935-Sept. 30, 1977
TotalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs employers onlyVs unions onlyVs both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals2892404144
On petitions for review and/or enforcement2602553744100.0100.0100.0100.06,523100.0
Board orders affirmed in full177146274067.973.0100.04,12863.3
Board orders affirmed with modification312830013.08.11,05916.2
Remanded to Board1033041.48.1100.02884.4
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded220000.9991.5
Board orders set aside403640016.710.894914.6
On petitions for contempt2925400100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition, before court order6510020.025.0
Court orders holding respondent in contempt232030080.075.0
Court orders denying petition00000
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court21100100.0100.0217100.0
Board orders affirmed in full21100100.0100.013059.9
Board order affirmed with modification00000167.3
Board orders set aside000003415.6
Remanded to Board00000188.3
Remanded to court of appeals00000167.4
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied0000010.5
Contempt cases remanded to courts of appeals0000010.5
Contempt cases enforced0000010.5

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal year 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See Glossary for definitions of terms.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 The Board filed an amicus brief in one case, Farmer v. Carpenters, 430 U.S. 290, involving a preemption question. The Board's position was not adopted by the Court.

36 of 56 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out. 1 cell breaks a sum: 'On petitions for review and/or', column 2: prints 260, columns 3 to 6 add to 300.

Reader’s notes

p. 324. DOUBTFUL CELL — row "On petitions for review and/or enforcement", column "Vs. employers only" (Number of proceedings): the glyphs read as 255 on this scan and are transcribed as printed, but every arithmetic check implies 215. Its five detail rows sum to 146+28+3+2+36 = 215; the parent row "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals" prints 240 in that column, and 240 - 25 ("On petitions for contempt") = 215; and the printed percentages in the "Vs employers only" column are all computed on a base of 215 (146/215 = 67.9, 28/215 = 13.0, 3/215 = 1.4, 2/215 = 0.9, 36/215 = 16.7; a base of 255 would give 57.3, 11.0, 1.2, 0.8, 14.1). So this is either a misprint in the source or a 1-vs-5 ambiguity in this 1-bit scan; a downstream user should treat the intended value as 215. All other columns of that row reconcile exactly (260 = 177+31+10+2+40; 37; 4; 4). DECIMAL POINTS — the scan drops most decimal points in the percentage columns, which print as e.g. "100 0", "67 9", "63 3", "0 5". These are restored as 100.0, 67.9, 63.3, 0.5, etc., matching the cells where the point did survive (1.5, 15.6, 7.4, 0.5). Likewise the faded periods in "U S" are restored to "U.S." in the two "Proceedings decided by ..." row labels and in footnote 3 ("430 U.S. 290"). Printed-as-is inconsistency, not corrected: in the Supreme Court section both "Board order affirmed with modification" and "Remanded to court of appeals" show 16 in the cumulative Number column, but the Percent column prints 7.3 for the first and 7.4 for the second (16/217 = 7.37). The cumulative percent column still sums to 100.0 as printed. Row-label wording kept as printed, including the singular "Board order affirmed with modification" in the Supreme Court section versus the plural "Board orders affirmed with modification" in the courts-of-appeals section. The stub column carries no printed heading, so cell 0 of each heading level is empty. Dash rules ("------") in the percentage and cumulative columns are rendered as empty cells.

Source image

Source page 324 of NLRB FY1977 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1977, p. 324.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.