Formal Actions Taken in Amendment of Certification and Unit Clarification Cases, Fiscal Year 1977

p. 288. Continuation page ("—Contd."), so the body begins mid-table; headings are printed on this page and are transcribed. Arithmetic flag (transcribed as printed, not corrected): in the upper block the "Cases in which formal actions taken" figure does not equal AC + UC — Hearings completed 162 vs 14+121=135; Decision issued after hearing 169 vs 16+126=142; By regional directors 152 vs 14+112=126; By Board 17 vs 2+14=16; Transferred by regional directors for initial decision 10 vs 0+9=9; Review of regional directors' decisions 30 vs 4+24=28; Requests for review received 30 vs 4+24=28. Each column is internally consistent on its own (152+17=169; 14+2=16; 112+14=126), and every row from "Withdrawn before request ruled upon" downward does sum across (22=4+18, 8=2+6, 14=2+12, 7=2+5, 5=2+3). I re-read the scan twice and the digits above are what is printed; the "6" glyphs in 162, 169, 126 and 6 are slightly filled in this 1-bit scan but read consistently as 6 rather than 8. "Regional directors' decisions." is a label-only line introducing Affirmed / Modified / Reversed; its value cells are blank in the image. The trailing mark after "decisions" is a period as printed (could be a degraded colon). The scan has stray specks in the stub area (a short dash right of "Decision issued after hearing", a tick after "By Board", a comma-like mark after "regional" in "Review of regional directors' decisions"); these are artifacts, not footnote markers, and are not transcribed. No footnote markers appear on any value, label or heading. The bottom rule of the table is at the very edge of the crop and a few partial marks appear below it at the left; if footnote text is printed under this table it is cut off by the crop, so the empty footnote list may be incomplete.