NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1976 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1976

Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1976

printed as Table 2 · source page 220 · nlrb1976_p0220_t0

Number of cases showing specific allegationsPercent of total cases
A. Charges filed against employers under sec. 8(a)
Subsections of sec. 8(a)
Total cases23,496100.0
8(a)(1)3,35814.3
8(a)(1)(2)3291.4
8(a)(1)(3)12,10851.4
8(a)(1)(4)1240.5
8(a)(1)(5)4,44418.9
8(a)(1)(2)(3)3281.4
8(a)(1)(2)(4)40.0
8(a)(1)(2)(5)1180.5
8(a)(1)(3)(4)4892.1
8(a)(1)(3)(5)1,8968.1
8(a)(1)(4)(5)120.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)270.1
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)1570.7
8(a)(1)(2)(4)(5)170.1
8(a)(1)(3)(4)(5)620.3
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)230.1
Recapitulation
8(a)(1)23,496100.0
8(a)(2)1,0034.3
8(a)(3)15,09064.2
8(a)(4)7583.2
8(a)(5)6,72928.6
B. Charges filed against unions under sec. 8(b)
Subsections of sec. 8(b)
Total cases10,806100.0
8(b)(1)5,40350.0
8(b)(2)2672.5
8(b)(3)5244.8
8(b)(4)2,26521.1
8(b)(5)50.0
8(b)(6)150.1
8(b)(7)4444.1
8(b)(1)(2)1,52014.1
8(b)(1)(3)2051.9
8(b)(1)(5)110.1
8(b)(1)(6)60.1
8(b)(2)(3)130.1
8(b)(2)(5)10.0
8(b)(2)(6)30.0
8(b)(3)(5)20.0
8(b)(3)(6)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)1031.0
8(b)(1)(2)(5)80.1
8(b)(1)(2)(6)30.0
8(b)(1)(3)(5)10.0
8(b)(1)(3)(6)30.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(5)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(3)(6)10.0
8(b)(1)(2)(5)(6)10.0
Recapitulation
8(b)(1)7,26667.2
8(b)(2)1,92117.8
8(b)(3)8547.9
8(b)(4)2,26521.1
8(b)(5)300.3
8(b)(6)330.3
8(b)(7)4444.1
B1. Analysis of 8(b)(4)
Total cases 8(b)(4)2,265100.0
8(b)(4)(A)924.1
8(b)(4)(B)1,69474.7
8(b)(4)(C)30.1
8(b)(4)(D)44619.7
8(b)(4)(A)(B)241.1
8(b)(4)(B)(C)60.3
Recapitulation
8(b)(4)(A)1165.1
8(b)(4)(B)1,72476.1
8(b)(4)(C)90.4
8(b)(4)(D)44619.7
B2. Analysis of 8(b)(7)
Total cases 8(b)(7)444100.0
8(b)(7)(A)10122.7
8(b)(7)(B)214.7
8(b)(7)(C)31370.6
8(b)(7)(A)(B)10.2
8(b)(7)(A)(B)(C)81.8
Recapitulation
8(b)(7)(A)11024.8
8(b)(7)(B)306.8
8(b)(7)(C)32172.3
C. Charges filed under sec. 8(e)
Total cases 8(e)115100.0
Against unions alone10692.2
Against employers alone32.6
Against unions and employers65.2
D. Charges filed under sec. 8(g)
Total cases 8(g)92100.0

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one subsection of the Act. Therefore, the total of the various allegations is greater than the total number of cases.
  2. 2 Sec. 8(a)(1) is a general provision forbidding any type of employer interference with the rights of the employees guaranteed by the Act, and therefore is included in all charges of employer unfair labor practices.

0 of 79 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 220. Two-panel layout: the left panel (section A, its recapitulation, and the start of section B) is transcribed first, then the right panel (continuation of section B's recapitulation, B1, B2, C, D). The column headings "Number of cases showing specific allegations" / "Percent of total cases" are printed once over each panel and are given once here. Punctuation restoration: this is a coarse 1-bit scan in which many periods did not print. In the percent column most cells show as e.g. "14. 3", "1 4", "100 0"; since every value in that column is a one-decimal percentage I have written them with the decimal point ("14.3", "1.4", "100.0"). Likewise the abbreviation periods in the section lines "B. Charges filed against unions under sec. 8(b)", "D. Charges filed under sec. 8(g)" and the sentence-ending periods in the two footnotes are faint or absent on the image and have been written in; the wording is otherwise exactly as printed. Row structure: in sections A and B the stub prints "Subsections of sec. 8(a)" (resp. 8(b)) on its own line with no values, with an indented "Total cases" line carrying the figures below it; I have kept these as two rows rather than joining them. "Against unions and em-/ployers" is one row, the hyphen repaired. Arithmetic cross-checks: every "Number of cases" figure I read is confirmed by the internal sums (the 8(a) and 8(b) detail rows add exactly to 23,496 and 10,806; each recapitulation line equals the sum of the detail rows containing that subsection; B1, B2 and C details add to 2,265, 444 and 115). Four printed percentages do not match the implied ratio in the last digit and are transcribed as printed, not corrected: 8(a)(1)(3) "51.4" (12,108/23,496 = 51.5), 8(b)(4) "21.1" in both the left-panel detail and the right-panel recapitulation (2,265/10,806 = 21.0), 8(b)(4)(B) "74.7" (1,694/2,265 = 74.8) and 8(b)(7)(C) "70.6" (313/444 = 70.5). These are either the report's own rounding or a blurred final digit; the surrounding counts are certain. Minor doubtful cell: the percent for 8(b)(1)(3)(5) appears as "0.0." with a stray trailing dot (likely a leader-dot artifact); transcribed as "0.0".

Source image

Source page 220 of NLRB FY1976 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1976, p. 220.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.