NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1975 › Representation Elections in Which Objections and/or Determinative Challenges Were Ruled On in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1975

Representation Elections in Which Objections and/or Determinative Challenges Were Ruled On in Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1975

printed as Table 11B · source page 240 · nlrb1975_p0240_t0

Total electionsObjections onlyChallenges onlyObjections and challengesTotal objectionsTotal challenges
Total electionsNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent
All representation elections8,9168639.72943.31611.81,02411.54555.1
By type of case
In RC cases8,05280710.02723.41461.895311.84185.2
In RM cases338216.2113.382.4298.6195.6
In RD cases526356.7112.171.3428.0183.4
By type of election
Consent elections1,008515.1151.58.8595.9232.3
Stipulated elections6,0945939.71993.31121.870511.53115.1
Expedited elections15213.300213.30
Regional director-directed elections1,71321212.4694.0352.024714.41046.1
Board-directed elections8655.81112.867.01112.81719.8

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 Number of elections in which objections were ruled on, regardless of number of allegations in each election.
  2. 2 Number of elections in which challenges were ruled on, regardless of individual ballots challenged in each election

24 of 51 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 240. 12 columns: stub plus "Total elections" (a tall single heading spanning both heading levels) plus five two-column pairs. The stub heading is blank in this table. Decimal points: the scan drops or badly fades the decimal point in many Percent cells, which print as a gap (e.g. "9 7", "11 5", "13 3", "12 8", "6 1", "5 2", "8 0", "2 1", "4 0", "2 0"). All of these are one-decimal percentages and have been transcribed with the decimal point restored (9.7, 11.5, 13.3, 12.8, 6.1, 5.2, 8.0, 2.1, 4.0, 2.0). No digits were changed. Every such reading is confirmed by the printed Number and Total elections in the same row. "Objections and challenges / Number" for "Consent elections" and for "Board-directed elections": each digit is preceded in the scan by a speck that reads like a decimal point (".8" and ".6"). A count column cannot hold a fractional value, and the row and column arithmetic fixes them as 8 and 6 (51 + 8 = 59 and 15 + 8 = 23 for Consent; 5 + 6 = 11 and 11 + 6 = 17 for Board-directed; the column also sums 8 + 112 + 0 + 35 + 6 = 161). Transcribed as "8" and "6", treating the mark as scanner dirt. Note that the adjacent Percent cell for Consent elections genuinely is ".8" (printed without a leading zero) and is kept as such. "By type of case" is followed in the print by a single small dot, almost certainly a surviving leader dot (the parallel section line "By type of election" has none); it has been dropped. Row label letterspacing in the print makes some labels look split ("A ll representation elections", "In R C cases"); transcribed closed up. "Expedited elections" has a dash rule (no value) in three Percent cells: Challenges only, Objections and challenges, and Total challenges; these are "". Arithmetic consistency: all row and column sums check out (8,052 + 338 + 526 = 8,916; 1,008 + 6,094 + 15 + 1,713 + 86 = 8,916; Objections only + Objections and challenges = Total objections in every row; Challenges only + Objections and challenges = Total challenges in every row). No misprints detected.

Source image

Source page 240 of NLRB FY1975 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1975, p. 240.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.