NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1975 › Remedial Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1975

Remedial Actions Taken in Unfair Labor Practice Cases Closed, Fiscal Year 1975

printed as Table 4 · source pages 223–224 · nlrb1975_p0223_t0

Stitched from pp. 223–224.

Action takenTotal allRemedial action taken by—
Action takenTotal allEmployerUnion
Action takenTotal allTotalPursuant to—TotalPursuant to—
Action takenTotal allTotalAgreement of partiesRecommendation of administrative law judgeOrder of—TotalAgreement of partiesRecommendation of administrative law judgeOrder of—
Action takenTotal allTotalInformal settlementFormal settlementRecommendation of administrative law judgeBoardCourtTotalInformal settlementFormal settlementRecommendation of administrative law judgeBoardCourt
A By number of cases involved8,044
Notice posted3,9702,8261,94610025252531,144752113018099
Recognition or other assistance withdrawn60603930135
Employer-dominated union disestablished3333240054
Employees offered reinstatement1,5321,5321,035360286175
Employees placed on preferential hiring list9191821062
Hiring hall rights restored4646372061
Objections to employment withdrawn61613810184
Picketing ended657657599270229
Work stoppage ended1991991912024
Collective bargaining begun1,6241,4661,2123111279515813510517
Backpay distributed2,2492,0701,536720307155179832002947
Reimbursement of fees, dues, and fines294152911103020142562004422
Other conditions of employment improved1,7181,0861,07510826326271022
Other remedies372723004010100000
B. By number of employees affected
Employees offered reinstatement, total3,8163,8162,6821130518503
Accepted2,6082,6082,003580244303
Declined1,2081,208679550274200
Employees placed on preferential hiring list48048046030107
Hiring hall rights restored6969586041
Objections to employment withdrawn98987050167
Employees receiving backpay
From either employer or union7,3936,9484,62340501,0528684452166024199
From both employer and union1212500701250070
Employees reimbursed for fees, dues, and fines
From either employer or union6,2273,2121,71443206304363,0151,0037210861430
From both employer and union13313347008601334700860
C. By amounts of monetary recovery, total$12,019,170$11,041,610$6,065,640$843,2200$2,055,860$2,076,890$977,560$313,120$126,4000$375,460$162,580
Backpay (includes all monetary payments except fees, dues, and fines)11,286,16010,745,0005,809,150838,46002,031,3202,066,070541,160285,4707,310095,600152,780
Reimbursement of fees, dues, and fines733,010296,610256,4904,760024,54010,820436,40027,650119,0900279,8609,800

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 See Glossary for definitions of terms. Data in this table are based on unfair labor practice cases that were closed during fiscal year 1975 after the company and/or union had satisfied all remedial action requirements.
  2. 2 A single case usually results in more than one remedial action, therefore, the total number of actions exceeds the number of cases involved.

213 of 216 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out. 3 cells break a sum: 'A By number of cases involved', column 2: prints 8,044, the subtotals in columns 3 to 9 add to 0; 'From both employer and union', column 2: prints 12, the subtotals in columns 3 to 9 add to 24; 'From both employer and union', column 2: prints 133, the subtotals in columns 3 to 9 add to 266.

Reader’s notes

p. 223. Crop/completeness: the caption carries footnote marker 1 and the "A By number of cases involved" total carries marker 2, but no footnote text is printed within this crop, so `footnotes` is empty. The crop also ends immediately after the "Other remedies" row; section A is a lettered section, so a companion section (e.g. "B. By number of workers involved") and the footnote block most likely continue below the crop boundary. Row label: the section line is printed with a bold "A" set in the left margin followed by "By number of cases involved" with no period after the letter; transcribed as printed, "A By number of cases involved". Doubtful cells (all minor, scan speckle on a 300-ppi bitonal scan): in "Objections to employment withdrawn", the Union/Total cell shows a small stray tick immediately before the digits, read here as 61 (not a footnote marker — it is not a raised digit or letter and the row sums confirm 38+1+0+18+4 = 61). Similar isolated specks sit above the Employer/Board cell of "Employees offered reinstatement" (286) and beside "44" in Union/Board of the "Reimbursement of fees, dues, and fines" row; neither affects the reading. Blank cells: rows that apply to only one party show a dashed leader rule ("------") across the other party's six columns; per instruction these are transcribed as "". Arithmetic check (not used to alter any cell, only to corroborate column placement): every data row's five Employer detail columns sum to the Employer Total, the five Union detail columns sum to the Union Total, and Employer Total + Union Total equals Total all. All 14 data rows check out exactly as transcribed, which gives good assurance that no value has been shifted between columns.

p. 224. This crop continues a table from the previous page: no column headings are printed on it, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 14 columns (stub + 13 numeric columns), counted from the column rules and confirmed by the rows that carry a value in every column (e.g. "From either employer or union" under "Employees receiving backpay"). Dash rules ("------") fill columns 8-13 on the reinstatement/preferential-hiring rows and columns 2-7 on the "Hiring hall rights restored" and "Objections to employment withdrawn" rows; these are transcribed as empty cells. Internal arithmetic is consistent throughout, which supports the column placement: in each panel group col 2 = sum of cols 3-7, col 8 = sum of cols 9-13, and col 1 = col 2 + col 8 (e.g. 4,623+405+0+1,052+868 = 6,948; 216+6+0+24+199 = 445; 6,948+445 = 7,393; likewise $11,041,610 + $977,560 = $12,019,170). Doubtful/uncertain items: - The period after the section letter in "C. By amounts of monetary recovery, total" is faint or dropped in the scan (the "B." above it is clear); I transcribed it with the period to match the sibling label. - The marker on the second footnote is a worn raised digit that could be read as 2 or 3; given footnote 1 precedes it, I transcribed it as 2. Sentence-ending periods in both footnotes are faint in this 1-bit scan and were restored as printed convention. - There is a small stray ink mark in the "Employees placed on preferential hiring list" row just left of the value 3 (column 4); it is a scan artifact, not a digit or a footnote marker. - Columns 5 and 11 carry a plain printed "0" (no dollar sign) in the three monetary rows, unlike the dollar-signed figures beside them in row "C."; transcribed as printed.

Source image

Source page 223 of NLRB FY1975 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1975, p. 223.
Source page 224 of NLRB FY1975 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1975, p. 224.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.