NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1973 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1973; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-73

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1973; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-73

printed as Table 19 · source page 263 · nlrb1973_p0263_t0

Fiscal Year 1973July 5, 1935–June 30, 1973
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1935–June 30, 1973
TotalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals3683075515
On petitions for review and/or enforcement3502925215100.0100.0100.0100.05,399100.0
Board orders affirmed in full252206440270.584.640.03,31461.4
Board orders affirmed with modification373430011.65.895717.7
Remanded to Board17140034.860.02334.3
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded211000.41.9771.4
Board orders set aside423741012.77.7100.081815.2
On petitions for contempt1815300100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition, before court order131120073.366.7
Court orders holding respondent in contempt5410026.733.3
Court orders denying petition00000
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court64200100.0100.0
Board orders affirmed in full3120025.0100.0
Board orders affirmed with modification00000
Board orders set aside00000
Remanded to Board3300075.0
Remanded to court of appeals00000
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied00000
Contempt cases remanded to courts of appeals00000
Contempt cases enforced00000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal year 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See Glossary for definition of terms.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 The courts of appeals was directed in turn, to remand these cases to the Board for reconsideration in the light of N.L.R.B. v. Burns, 406 U.S. 272.

50 of 50 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 263. Decimal points: this scan drops most periods, so the same value is printed both as "100.0" (e.g. the Supreme Court row) and as "100 0" (e.g. the review/enforcement row). Since the gap is uniformly one decimal place and the clear instances confirm the intended form, every percentage has been transcribed with its decimal point restored: "70 5" -> 70.5, "84 6" -> 84.6, "11 6" -> 11.6, "5 8" -> 5.8, "4 8" -> 4.8, "0 4" -> 0.4, "1 9" -> 1.9, "12 7" -> 12.7, "40 0" -> 40.0, "60 0" -> 60.0, "17 7" -> 17.7, "4 3" -> 4.3, "73 3" -> 73.3, "66 7" -> 66.7, "33 3" -> 33.3, "25 0" -> 25.0. No digits were altered. The same period loss affects text: the stub reads "U S. courts of appeals" and the headings read "Vs em-ployers only" / "Vs both em-ployers and unions" in the Percentages block while the Number block prints "Vs." with a visible period. These have been normalized to "U.S." and "Vs.". Footnote periods (sentence ends, "N.L.R.B.", "v.", "406 U.S. 272") were likewise restored. The stub column has no printed heading; the only mark in that area of the header is a small ink smudge, so the stub cell is empty at all three heading levels. Row 16, "Remanded to Board" in the Supreme Court section, prints "3 3" in the Total column; the second character is a raised footnote marker keyed to footnote 3, so the cell is transcribed as 3^3. Cells holding only a dash rule ("----", "- -", "--") are rendered as "". The dash runs are of uneven length and some are very faint, but in every case they sit where a percentage or cumulative figure is not applicable, not where a value was lost. Arithmetic as printed: in the "On petitions for review and/or enforcement" block the Total column sums to 350 (252+37+17+2+42) and the employers-only column to 292, both matching their printed subtotals. The Supreme Court detail rows sum to 6 in Total (3+0+0+3+0+0+0+0) and 4 in employers-only, also matching. Nothing was computed or corrected.

Source image

Source page 263 of NLRB FY1973 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1973, p. 263.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.