NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1971 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1971; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-71

Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1971; and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-71

printed as Table 19 · source page 205 · nlrb1971_p0205_t0

Fiscal year 1971July 5, 1935-June 30, 1971
Number of proceedingsPercentagesJuly 5, 1935-June 30, 1971
TotalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalVs. employers onlyVs. unions onlyVs. both employers and unionsBoard dismissalNumberPercent
Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals3923305219
On petitions for review and/or enforcement3713144719100.0100.0100.0100.04,708100.0
Board orders affirmed in full275227400872.385.188.92,82360.0
Board orders affirmed with modification464420014.04.388118.7
Remanded to Board15104103.28.5100.02004.2
Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded11000.3701.5
Board orders set aside343210110.22.111.173415.6
On petitions for contempt2116500100.0100.0
Compliance after filing of petition, before court order7520031.340.0
Court orders holding respondent in contempt131030062.560.0
Court orders denying petition110006.2
Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court42200100.0100.0
Board orders affirmed in full2110050.050.0
Board orders affirmed with modification00000
Board orders set aside1100050.0
Remanded to Board00000
Remanded to court of appeals1010050.0
Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied00000
Contempt cases remanded to court of appeals00000
Contempt cases enforced00000

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 "Proceedings" are comparable to "cases" reported in annual reports prior to fiscal year 1964. This term more accurately describes the data inasmuch as a single "proceeding" often includes more than one "case." See "Glossary" for definitions of terms.
  2. 2 A proceeding in which the Board had entered an order dismissing the complaint and the charging party appealed such dismissal in the courts of appeals.
  3. 3 Board appeared as amicus curiae in two cases. Industrial, Technical & Professional Employees, Div. of Natl. Maritime Union, AFL-CIO v. Sea Pak. Div. of W. R. Grace & Co., 400 U.S. 985-Board's position sustained, and Lockridge v. Amalgamated Assn. of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of Amer., 403 U.S. 274-Board's position sustained.

54 of 54 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 205. 12 columns: stub, 5 "Number of proceedings" columns, 4 "Percentages" columns, and 2 cumulative columns. The stub column has no printed heading, so cell 0 of each header row is empty. Decimal points: the scan drops many periods in the percentage columns, which print as a gap (e.g. "100 0", "14 0", "3 2", "8 5", "10 2", "31 3", "6 2", "50 0"). Since the same values print with a clear period elsewhere in the same columns, these are transcribed with the decimal point restored. Doubtful cell: row "Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded", column "Percentages / Vs. employers only" is printed as a bare "3" with no visible decimal point; it is transcribed as ".3", which is what 1 of 314 gives and what makes that column sum to 100.0. Verify against a cleaner copy if the leading character matters. Footnote markers: the second footnote's marker is printed as a blurred glyph that resembles "3", but it is footnote 2 (keyed to "Board dismissal" in the "Number of proceedings" group) and is transcribed as 2. In footnote 3 the scan renders "two cases" as "twc cases"; transcribed as "two". Scan artifacts in digits (all resolved by the row/column sums, which check out): several 5s render like "6" — "52" (row 1, Vs. unions only), "275", "15", "15.6", "5" (On petitions for contempt, Vs. unions only), and "July 5, 1935" in the heading. The stub labels "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals" and "Board dismissal" show similar speckling. Arithmetic checks pass throughout: 330+52+1+9=392; 314+47+1+9=371; the five review/enforcement detail rows sum to each of their column totals; 16+5=21 and the three contempt detail rows sum to 21; 371+21=392; the Supreme Court detail rows sum to 4; and the cumulative column gives 2,823+881+200+70+734=4,708 with percentages summing to 100.0. No misprints detected. Dash rules ("------") appear in the inapplicable percentage and cumulative cells and are transcribed as empty.

Source image

Source page 205 of NLRB FY1971 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1971, p. 205.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.