NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1970 › Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1970

Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1970

printed as Table 20 · source page 207 · nlrb1970_p0207_t0

Total proceedingsInjunction proceedingsTotal dispositionsDisposition of injunctionsPending in district court June 30, 1970
Total proceedingsPending in district court July 1, 1969Filed in district court fiscal year 1970Total dispositionsGrantedDeniedSettledWithdrawnDismissedInactivePending in district court June 30, 1970
Under sec. 10(e), total31233000000
Under sec. 10(j), total181171512200103
8(a)(1)(2)10111000000
8(a)(1)(2)(3); 8(b)(1)(A)(2)11010000100
8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)10110100000
8(a)(1)(3)10100000001
8(a)(1)(3), 8(b)(1)(A)(2)10111000000
8(a)(1)(3)(5)30332100000
8(a)(1)(5)30333000000
8(b)(1)(A)30333000000
8(b)(1)(B)(3)20200000002
8(b)(1)(B)(3), 8(a)(1)(5)10111000000
8(b)(3)10111000000
Under sec. 10(l), total234232112208512683021414
8(b)(4)(A)10110010000
8(b)(4)(A)(B)20222000000
8(b)(4)(A)(B), 8(e)20220010010
8(b)(4)(B)112610610738536121425
8(b)(4)(B)(D)16115167144000
8(b)(4)(B); 8(e)10110001000
8(b)(4)(C)30333000000
8(b)(4)(D)661155582441510508
8(b)(7)(A)30331020000
8(b)(7)(B)93695011200
8(b)(7)(C)15114144261011
8(e)41341021000

Download this table (CSV)

147 of 147 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 207. Twelve columns: stub plus eleven numeric columns. The stub has no printed heading. "Total proceedings", "Total dispositions" and "Pending in district court June 30, 1970" are tall single headings spanning both heading levels, so each is repeated in both rows; "Injunction proceedings" spans two columns and "Disposition of injunctions" spans six. No footnotes are printed under the table. Arithmetic check (not applied to any cell, only reported): the detail rows sum exactly to their printed section totals in all eleven numeric columns, for both the 10(j) block (11 detail rows) and the 10(l) block (12 detail rows). No misprints detected. Scan legibility: the digit 5 in the statutory row labels is printed with a flat-topped glyph that can read as a 6 at this resolution. I transcribed "8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5)", "8(a)(1)(3)(5)", "8(a)(1)(5)" and "8(b)(1)(B)(3), 8(a)(1)(5)" as 5, which is consistent with the Act's subsections 8(a)(5)/8(b)(3) refusal-to-bargain citations; these are the only labels where I have any residual doubt. The "1969" in the "Pending in district court July 1, 1969" heading is likewise slightly broken in the scan but legible. Punctuation between paired citations varies as printed and was kept verbatim: a semicolon in "8(a)(1)(2)(3); 8(b)(1)(A)(2)" and "8(b)(4)(B); 8(e)", a comma in "8(a)(1)(3), 8(b)(1)(A)(2)", "8(b)(1)(B)(3), 8(a)(1)(5)" and "8(b)(4)(A)(B), 8(e)". The detail rows are indented under their section totals in the original; indentation is not carried into the labels. Leader dots after each label were dropped. The crop shows the full table, caption to closing rule, with nothing cut off.

Source image

Source page 207 of NLRB FY1970 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1970, p. 207.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.