NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1968 › Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1968
| Total proceedings | Injunction proceedings | Total dispositions | Disposition of injunctions | Pending in district court June 30, 1968 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total proceedings | Pending in district court July 1, 1967 | Filed in district court fiscal year 1968 | Total dispositions | Granted | Denied | Settled | Withdrawn | Dismissed | Inactive | Pending in district court June 30, 1968 | |
| Under sec. 10(e), total | 11 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Under sec. 10(j), total | 20 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 8(a)(1) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(2), 8(b)(1)(A)(2) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8(a)(1)(2)(3), 8(b)(1)(A)(2) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5), 8(b)(1)(A) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(2)(3)(5), 8(b)(1)(A)(2) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(3) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(a)(1)(3)(5) | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8(a)(1)(5) | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 8(b)(1)(3) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Under sec. 10(l), total | 170 | 5 | 165 | 150 | 57 | 8 | 45 | 22 | 1 | 17 | 20 |
| 8(b)(4)(A) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(4)(A)(B) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8(b)(4)(B) | 87 | 0 | 87 | 77 | 31 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| 8(b)(4)(B)(C) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(4)(B)(D) | 20 | 0 | 20 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 8(b)(4)(B), 8(b)(7)(C) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(4)(B), 8(e) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 8(b)(4)(C) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(4)(D) | 20 | 1 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 8(b)(7)(A) | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 8(b)(7)(B) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(7)(B)(C) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8(b)(7)(C) | 16 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 8(e) | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
158 of 158 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 255. Twelve columns: stub, "Total proceedings", two columns under "Injunction proceedings", "Total dispositions", six columns under "Disposition of injunctions", and "Pending in district court June 30, 1968". The stub column carries no printed heading, so cell 0 of both heading levels is empty. Footnote marker: in the "Under sec. 10(e), total" row the "Filed in district court fiscal year 1968" cell is printed as a raised 1 followed by 9; transcribed as 9^1. Row labels: the first section line clearly prints "Under sec." with a period; in the 10(j) and 10(l) section lines the period after "sec" is faint/absent in the scan. I have written all three with the period for consistency. The last section is section 10(l) (lowercase letter L), not 10(1). Arithmetic check (no values were altered): every column of the ten 10(j) detail rows sums exactly to the printed "Under sec. 10(j), total" line, and every column of the fourteen 10(l) detail rows sums exactly to the printed "Under sec. 10(l), total" line. The 10(e) row is also internally consistent (2 granted + 9 denied = 11 dispositions; 2 pending + 9 filed - 11 disposed = 0 pending). No misprints detected. The crop contains the full table, caption and footnote; nothing appears cut off.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.