Analysis of Method of Disposition of Jurisdictional Dispute Cases Closed Prior to Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, Fiscal Year 1967

p. 243. Three printed columns: the stub plus "Number of cases" and "Percent of total closed". The caption carries footnote marker 1, which is omitted here per instructions; the footnote itself is retained. Decimal typesetting: the percent column is printed throughout with a space after the decimal point ("100. 0", "2. 4", "40. 7", "14. 8", etc.); these are transcribed in the normal form "100.0", "2.4", etc. In the row "After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute" under "Agreement of the parties—Informal settlement" the decimal point is not visible in the scan — the cell reads "0 6" — and it is transcribed as "0.6" on the basis of the surrounding typesetting; the same row's figure under "Withdrawal" (0.4) prints its point clearly. The last two rows ("After opening of 10(k) hearing..." and "By Board decision and determination of dispute" under "Dismissal") have a dash rule in the percent column, transcribed as "". Four indented label rows repeat verbatim under more than one section heading ("Before 10(k) notice"; "After 10(k) notice, before opening of 10(k) hearing"; "After opening of 10(k) hearing, before issuance of Board decision and determination of dispute"); the section they belong to is given only by the preceding unindented row. As printed, the four section figures sum to the stated total (196+23+200+73 = 492; 39.8+4.7+40.7+14.8 = 100.0); no arithmetic was performed on the cells themselves.