NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1964 › Miscellaneous Litigation Involving NLRB: Outcome of Proceedings in Which Court Decisions Issued in Fiscal Year 1964
| Type of litigation | Number of proceedings | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of litigation | Total—all courts | In courts of appeals | In district courts | ||||||
| Type of litigation | Number decided | Court determination | Number decided | Court determination | Number decided | Court determination | |||
| Type of litigation | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position | Number decided | Upholding Board position | Contrary to Board position |
| Total—all types | 41 | 38 | 3 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 22 | 21 | 1 |
| NLRB-initiated actions | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| To enforce subpena | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To restrain dissipation of assets by respondent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| To defend board's jurisdiction | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Action by other parties | 37 | 35 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 21 | 20 | 1 |
| To restrain NLRB from | 31 | 30 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 | 17 | 1 |
| Proceeding in R-case | 24 | 23 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
| Proceeding in unfair labor practice case | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Proceeding in backpay case | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| To compel NLRB to | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Issue complaint | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Seek injunction | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Take action in R-case | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
93 of 93 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 217. Ten columns: stub plus three panels of three (Number decided, Upholding Board position, Contrary to Board position) under Total—all courts, In courts of appeals, In district courts. These are stacked column groups of one table, not side-by-side panels, so each row spans all nine value columns. No footnotes are printed under the table. All cells are legible and every arithmetic relation checks out as printed: component rows sum to their section heads (e.g. 2+1+1+0=4 under NLRB-initiated actions; 24+4+1+2=31 under To restrain NLRB from), sections sum to Total—all types (4+37=41), and the courts-of-appeals plus district-courts figures sum to the Total—all courts figures in every row (19+22=41, 17+21=38, 2+1=3). Spelling and capitalisation kept as printed: "subpena" (archaic spelling), lowercase "board's" in "To defend board's jurisdiction" where other labels use "NLRB"/"Board", and "R-case". The label "Other" appears three times (under NLRB-initiated actions, under To restrain NLRB from, and under To compel NLRB to); each is a separate printed row at its own indent level. Indentation in the original distinguishes section heads from their components, but the grid format carries no indent, so hierarchy is only inferable from the label wording and ruled separator lines.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.