Injunction Litigation Under Section 10(e), 10(j), and 10(l), Fiscal Year 1964

p. 216. 12 columns: stub, "Total proceedings", two columns under "Injunction proceedings", "Total dispositions", six columns under "Disposition of injunctions", and "Pending in district courts June 30, 1964". No footnotes are printed under the table; the marginal "Appendix A" and the page number 203 are running head/folio and are excluded. Doubtful cells: in the last column ("Pending in district courts June 30, 1964"), a single "1" is printed ambiguously at the boundary between the 8(e) and 8(b)(7)(A) rows in the sec. 10(l) block; the far-right column's digits in this scan sit slightly below their row baselines, which makes the assignment hard to read. I placed it on 8(b)(7)(A) and left 8(e) as 0, because each row's own arithmetic supports that (8(e): 12 proceedings - 12 dispositions = 0; 8(b)(7)(A): 4 proceedings - 3 dispositions = 1), and either assignment gives the printed column total of 10. If the intent was the other way round, only those two cells swap. All other columns check out exactly against the printed section totals for both the sec. 10(j) and sec. 10(l) blocks, and every other row's components sum to its printed "Total dispositions", so no misprints were detected. Scan artifacts: stray specks appear near the "Denied"/"Inactive" headings, beside the 8(b)(4)(B) "Settled" value (24), and before the "0" in the 8(b)(4)(A)(B) and (7)(C) row's "Pending in district courts July 1, 1963" cell; none change the values. The 8(b)(4)(B)(C) row's "Total proceedings" 1 is printed with a broken serif but is clearly a 1.