NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1964 › Litigation for Enforcement and/or Review of Board Orders, Fiscal Year 1964, and Cumulative Totals, Fiscal Years 1936-1964
| Fiscal year 1964 | July 5, 1935-June 30, 1964 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of proceedings | Percentages | July 5, 1935-June 30, 1964 | |||||||||
| Total | Vs employers only | Vs unions only | Vs. both employers and unions | Board dismissal | Vs. employers only | Vs. unions only | Vs both employers and unions | Board dismissal | Number | Percent | |
| Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals | 259 | 193 | 43 | 11 | 12 | ||||||
| On petitions for review and for enforcement | 244 | 184 | 37 | 11 | 12 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 2,719 | 100 |
| Board orders affirmed in full | 134 | 105 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 57 | 54 | 9 | 67 | 1,559 | 57 |
| Board orders affirmed with modification | 53 | 41 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 22 | 19 | 46 | 0 | 546 | 20 |
| Remanded to Board | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 25 | 104 | 4 |
| Board orders partially affirmed and partially remanded | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 33 | 1 |
| Board orders set aside | 44 | 33 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 18 | 16 | 36 | 8 | 477 | 18 |
| On petitions for contempt | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | ||||
| Compliance after filing of petition, before court order | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 44 | 17 | 0 | ||||
| Court orders holding respondent in contempt | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 56 | 83 | 0 | ||||
| Court orders denying petition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 152 | 100 |
| Board orders affirmed in full | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 96 | 63 |
| Board orders affirmed with modification | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 8 |
| Board orders set aside | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 17 |
| Remanded to Board | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Remanded to court of appeals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 7 |
| Board's request for remand or modification of enforcement order denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Contempt case remanded to court of appeals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Contempt cases enforced | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
56 of 65 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
p. 214. 12 columns: stub, then 5 "Number of proceedings" columns, 4 "Percentages" columns, and 2 cumulative columns. The stub column carries no printed heading, so cell 0 is "" in all three heading levels; "July 5, 1935-June 30, 1964" is a tall heading spanning the top two levels over the last two columns and is repeated there. The spanner date reads "July 5, 1935-June 30, 1964" with an en dash in the original; it is transcribed with a hyphen. Period usage in the column headings is inconsistent in the original and is transcribed as printed: the "Number of proceedings" panel prints "Vs em-ployers only" and "Vs unions only" without a period but "Vs. both employers and unions" with one, while the "Percentages" panel prints "Vs. em-ployers only" and "Vs. unions only" with periods but "Vs both employers and unions" without. Dash rules (------) are rendered as "": the "Proceedings decided by U.S. courts of appeals" row has rules in all four percentage columns and in Number and Percent; "On petitions for contempt" and its three sub-rows have rules in the "Board dismissal" number column, the "Board dismissal" percentage column, and in Number and Percent. In the row label "Proceedings decided by U.S. Supreme Court" the period after the first "U" is faint/broken in the scan (it images as "U S. Supreme Court"); transcribed as "U.S." to match the parallel "U.S. courts of appeals" row. Likewise the italic-style "i" in several labels images without its dot ("in", "with", "petition"); normal spellings are used. All cross-checks pass: 193+43+11+12=259; the five review/enforcement outcome rows sum to 244, 184, 37, 11, 12 and their percentage columns each sum to 100; cumulative 1,559+546+104+33+477=2,719 with percents 57+20+4+1+18=100; contempt rows 5+10+0=15, 4+5+0=9, 1+5+0=6; Supreme Court rows sum to 6, 3, 1, 0, 2 with cumulative 96+13+26+3+11+1+1+1=152 and percents summing to 100. No printed value appears to be a misprint.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.