NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1964 › Distribution of Unfair Labor Practice Situations Received, by Number of Employees in Establishment, Fiscal Year 1964
| Size of establishment (number of employees) | Total | Type of situations | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size of establishment (number of employees) | Total | CA | CB | CC | CD | CE | CP | CA-CB combinations | Other C combinations | |||||||||
| Size of establishment (number of employees) | Percent of all situations | Cumulative percent of all situations | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | Percent by size class— | ||||||||
| Size of establishment (number of employees) | Percent of all situations | Cumulative percent of all situations | of all situations | of CA situations | of all situations | of CB situations | of all situations | of CC situations | of all situations | of CD situations | of all situations | of CE situations | of all situations | of CP situations | of all situations | of CA-CB situations | of all situations | of other C situations |
| 100.0 | 68.0 | 100.0 | 12.4 | 100.0 | 7.3 | 100.0 | 2.1 | 100.0 | 0.4 | 100.0 | 2.6 | 100.0 | 6.0 | 100.0 | 1.2 | 100.0 | ||
| 1-24 | 33.5 | 33.5 | 67.6 | 32.6 | 9.1 | 27.3 | 10.6 | 50.8 | 2.0 | 33.2 | .4 | 42.5 | 4.6 | 57.6 | 3.8 | 21.3 | 1.9 | 50.3 |
| 25-49 | 17.7 | 51.2 | 73.1 | 18.5 | 10.0 | 15.7 | 6.6 | 16.4 | 1.8 | 16.2 | [3] | 3.0 | 2.8 | 18.2 | 4.7 | 13.8 | 1.0 | 14.7 |
| 50-74 | 9.3 | 60.5 | 75.9 | 10.2 | 8.9 | 7.4 | 4.3 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 5.7 | .4 | 12.2 | 2.2 | 7.6 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 7.7 |
| 75-99 | 5.6 | 66.1 | 68.8 | 5.5 | 10.3 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 5.2 | .5 | 9.1 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 5.6 |
| 100-149 | 6.7 | 72.8 | 74.2 | 7.1 | 9.8 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 10.0 | .1 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 5.6 |
| 150-199 | 5.5 | 78.3 | 73.2 | 5.9 | 11.7 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 5.2 | .2 | 3.0 | .9 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 7.2 | .6 | 2.8 |
| 200-299 | 5.2 | 83.5 | 71.6 | 5.4 | 15.8 | 7.3 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 3.1 | .0 | .0 | .7 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 4.9 | .8 | 3.5 |
| 300-399 | 3.0 | 86.5 | 72.4 | 3.1 | 12.4 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.2 | .0 | .0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 2.8 |
| 400-499 | 2.4 | 88.9 | 58.5 | 2.0 | 17.8 | 3.9 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 4.8 | .7 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 8.5 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 500-599 | 1.3 | 90.2 | 72.5 | 1.3 | 9.4 | 1.1 | 4.6 | .9 | 2.7 | 1.7 | .0 | .0 | .7 | .3 | 9.4 | 2.0 | .7 | .7 |
| 600-799 | 1.5 | 91.7 | 62.1 | 1.3 | 16.6 | 2.1 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.3 | .6 | 3.0 | .6 | .3 | 10.0 | 2.4 | .0 | .0 |
| 800-999 | 1.5 | 93.2 | 53.7 | 1.2 | 20.3 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | .9 | .6 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 15.3 | 3.9 | .0 | .0 |
| 1,000-1,999 | 2.6 | 95.8 | 60.3 | 2.3 | 19.7 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 6.5 | .3 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 7.6 | 3.3 | .7 | 1.4 |
| 2,000-2,999 | 1.1 | 96.9 | 54.2 | .9 | 22.1 | 2.2 | 3.8 | .6 | 1.5 | .9 | .0 | .0 | .8 | .3 | 16.8 | 3.2 | .8 | .7 |
| 3,000-3,999 | .6 | 97.5 | 65.7 | .5 | 17.9 | .9 | .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 10.4 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.7 |
| 4,000-4,999 | .6 | 98.1 | 48.5 | .4 | 26.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | .1 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 6.1 | .0 | .0 | 14.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | .7 |
| 5,000-9,999 | .8 | 98.9 | 63.0 | .7 | 20.7 | 1.5 | 4.3 | .5 | 2.2 | .9 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.1 | .3 | 7.6 | 1.0 | .0 | .0 |
| 10,000 and over | 1.1 | 100.0 | 69.2 | 1.1 | 16.5 | 1.7 | .8 | .1 | 1.5 | .9 | .8 | 3.0 | .0 | .0 | 11.2 | 2.1 | .0 | .0 |
p. 213. 19 columns: stub, 2 under "Total", and 16 under "Type of situations" (two per situation type: "of all situations" and "of <type> situations"). Decimal points: this is a 1-bit scan in which many printed periods dropped out, so a great many cells image as e.g. "33 5", "68 0", "100 0" or a bare "4"/"7"/"0". Every value in the table is a percentage carried to one decimal place, so I have restored the decimal point in each such cell (".4", "33.5", "100.0"). No digits were changed. This reconstruction is corroborated by arithmetic: the eight "of all situations" columns sum to exactly 100.0 in every one of the 18 size-class rows; each of the eight "of <type> situations" columns sums to exactly 100.0 down the column; and the "Cumulative percent" column reproduces exactly as the running sum of the "Percent of all situations" column (33.5 ... 100.0). Sole cell failing those checks: row "3,000-3,999", last column ("Other C combinations" / "of other C situations"). It images as two characters, which I read as 3.7. Both the row relation (0.6 percent of all situations x 1.5 percent Other C, against a 1.2 percent Other C total, implies roughly 0.7-0.8) and the column total (the column sums to 102.3 with 3.7, but to exactly 100.0 with .7) indicate the intended value is .7. Transcribed as printed; treat as a probable misprint in the source, or less likely a misread of a blotted ".7". First body row is unlabeled (the all-sizes total line); its stub is blank as printed. Its "Cumulative percent" cell holds only a dash rule and is therefore "". Row "25-49", "CE" / "of all situations" holds the parenthesized footnote reference "(3)" in place of a value (footnote 3: less than one-tenth of 1 percent), not a number. Minor scan artifacts, not transcribed into cells: the "CA-CB combinations" column's spanner images as "Percent by sizo class-" (broken "size"); a stray dash sits to the left of "7.4" in row "400-499", "CC" / "of all situations"; the "1.1" in row "300-399", "Other C combinations" / "of all situations" images with a damaged leading 1. Footnote 2 reads "89 8 percent" in the scan; rendered as "89.8 percent". The stub heading and several column headings are hyphen-broken across lines in the original ("Size of establish-ment", "Cumu-lative", "situa-tions", "of CA-CB situations"); joined and repaired.
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.