Industrial Distribution of Cases Received, Fiscal Year 1964

p. 187. The crop ends in mid-table: the body is cut off after "Nonmetallic mining and quarrying" (a double rule closes that section at the bottom edge), so further industrial groups continue on the following page. No footnote texts are printed on this crop, although footnote markers appear in the caption ("Fiscal Year 1964 1") and in the stub heading ("Industrial group 2"); the footnote block must sit on a later page. Column structure: 13 data columns — "Unfair labor practice cases" spans All cases, All C cases, CA, CB, CC, CD, CE, CP (8 columns); "Representation cases" spans All R cases, RC, RM, RD (4 columns); "Union de-authorization cases" (hyphenated across lines in the original, joined here) is a tall heading over the single UD column. Reading aids: every row is internally consistent (CA+CB+CC+CD+CE+CP = All C cases, and All C + All R + UD = All cases), and the CA column sums to the printed Manufacturing subtotal of 5,994, so no misprints were detected. The sole legibility concern is a small stray scan mark to the right of "59" in the Manufacturing row, UD column; it is an artifact beside the digits, not a footnote marker, and the value is read as 59.

p. 188. This crop is a continuation page: no column headings are printed on it, so header_rows is empty. Column count (14 cells: stub + 13 data columns) was taken from the vertical column rules, which run the full height of the body; the rightmost data column is set off by a wider gap/double rule. The crop begins mid-table — rows above "Construction" (and the caption/headings) are on the preceding page. The body is divided by double horizontal rules into blocks; "Transportation, communication, and other public utilities" and "Services" are major-industry lines followed by their indented sub-industry lines, and the four opening rows (Construction, Wholesale trade, Retail trade, Finance, insurance, and real estate) are major-industry lines belonging to a block that starts on the previous page. Punctuation in footnote 2 is faint in the scan: the mark after "Source" and the periods in "U.S." are barely visible; I have transcribed them as "Source:" and "U.S." on the judgment that they are printed. The word is "Source" followed by what appears to be a colon or period. A stray ink mark (a short bracket-like stroke) sits beside the value 1 in the 6th data column of "Medical and other health services"; I read it as a scan artifact, not a footnote marker. Similarly a small tick appears in the left margin beside "Miscellaneous services". Scan quality is good; the typesetting leaves spaces after digit-grouping commas (e.g. "2, 772"), which have been closed up as instructed. No footnote markers are attached to any body value on this crop.