NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1963 › Total Cases Received, Closed, and Pending (Complainant or Petitioner Identified), Fiscal Year 1963

Total Cases Received, Closed, and Pending (Complainant or Petitioner Identified), Fiscal Year 1963

printed as Table 1 · source page 174 · nlrb1963_p0174_t0

Number of cases
TotalIdentification of complainant or petitioner
TotalAFL-CIO affiliatesUnaffiliated unionsIndividualsEmployers
All cases
Pending July 1, 19626,7042,9611,1811,633929
Received fiscal 196325,37110,6635,2466,2483,214
On docket fiscal 196332,07513,6246,4277,8814,143
Closed fiscal 196324,67810,3385,1715,9693,200
Pending June 30, 19637,3973,2861,2561,912943
Unfair labor practice cases
Pending July 1, 19624,6241,7335931,532766
Received fiscal 196314,1664,6671,6795,4952,325
On docket fiscal 196318,7906,4002,2727,0273,091
Closed fiscal 196313,6054,4121,6235,2402,330
Pending June 30, 19635,1851,9886491,787761
Representation cases
Pending July 1, 19622,0601,22858881163
Received fiscal 196311,1165,9963,567664889
On docket fiscal 196313,1767,2244,1557451,052
Closed fiscal 196310,9815,9263,548637870
Pending June 30, 19632,1951,298607108182
Union-shop deauthorization cases
Pending July 1, 19622020
Received fiscal 19638989
On docket fiscal 1963109109
Closed fiscal 19639292
Pending June 30, 19631717

Download this table (CSV)

  1. 1 Definitions of types of cases used in tables.—The following designations used by the Board in numbering cases are used in the tables in this appendix to designate the various types of cases CA A charge of unfair labor practices against an employer under sec. 8(a). CB A charge of unfair labor practices against a labor organization under sec. 8(b)(1), (2), (3), (5) (6) CC A charge of unfair labor practices against a labor organization under sec. 8(b)(4)(i) or (ii), (A), (B), (C) CD A charge of unfair labor practices against a labor organization under sec. 8(b)(4)(i) or (ii)(D). CE A charge of unfair labor practices against a labor organization and employer under sec 8(e) CP A charge of unfair labor practices against a labor organization under sec. 8(b)(7)(A), (B), (C) RC A petition by a labor organization or employees for certification of a representative for purposes of collective bargaining under sec 9(c)(1)(A)(i) RM A petition by employer for certification of a representative for purposes of collective bargaining under sec 9(c)(1)(B) RD A petition by employees under sec 9(c)(1)(A)(ii) asserting that the union previously certified or currently recognized by their employer as the bargaining representative no longer represents a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit UD A petition by employees under sec. 9(e)(1) asking for a referendum to rescind a bargaining agent's authority to make a union-shop contract under sec 8(a)(3)

85 of 85 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.

Reader’s notes

p. 174. Six columns: stub, Total, and the four "Identification of complainant or petitioner" columns. The stub column has no printed heading, so cell 0 of every header row is empty. "All cases^1", "Unfair labor practice cases", "Representation cases" and "Union-shop deauthorization cases" are centered banner lines spanning the data columns; they are transcribed as label-only rows. In the Union-shop deauthorization block the AFL-CIO affiliates, Unaffiliated unions and Employers cells hold dash rules, transcribed as "". Typesetting leaves a space after the comma in several figures: "3 214" (All cases / Received fiscal 1963 / Employers), "5 969" (All cases / Closed fiscal 1963 / Individuals), "4 155" (Representation cases / On docket fiscal 1963 / Unaffiliated unions) and "1 052" (Representation cases / On docket fiscal 1963 / Employers); these are rendered 3,214, 5,969, 4,155 and 1,052. All 20 data rows cross-foot exactly (the four identification columns sum to Total, and the three case-type blocks sum to All cases), which supports the digit readings. A small stray ink mark sits just left of 588 in Representation cases / Pending July 1, 1962 / Unaffiliated unions; it is printer's dirt, not a footnote marker. In the footnote the abbreviation "sec" is sometimes followed by a period and sometimes not, and the scan is too coarse to resolve each instance reliably; the roman-numeral subsection references are printed as lowercase (i)/(ii) and appear as (1)/(11) in the scan. A stray dot after "RD" has been dropped. The footnote's final line sits flush with the bottom edge of the crop; the UD entry appears complete, but any further footnote text would be cut off.

Source image

Source page 174 of NLRB FY1963 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1963, p. 174.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.