NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1960 › Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1960
Types of Unfair Labor Practices Alleged, Fiscal Year 1960
| Number of cases showing specific allegations | Percent of total cases | |
|---|---|---|
| A. CHARGES FILED AGAINST EMPLOYERS UNDER SEC. 8(a) | ||
| Total cases | 7,723 | 100.0 |
| 8(a)(1) | 7,723 | 100.0 |
| 8(a)(2) | 820 | 10.6 |
| 8(a)(3) | 6,044 | 78.3 |
| 8(a)(4) | 184 | 2.4 |
| 8(a)(5) | 1,753 | 22.7 |
| B. CHARGES FILED AGAINST UNIONS UNDER SEC. 8(b) | ||
| Total cases | 3,608 | 100.0 |
| 8(b)(1) | 2,196 | 60.9 |
| 8(b)(2) | 1,953 | 54.1 |
| 8(b)(3) | 282 | 7.8 |
| 8(b)(4) | 830 | 23.0 |
| 8(b)(5) | 16 | .4 |
| 8(b)(6) | 20 | .6 |
| 8(b)(7) | 273 | 7.6 |
| C. ANALYSIS OF 8(b)(4) AND 8(b)(7) | ||
| Total cases 8(b)(4) | 830 | 100.0 |
| 8(b)(4)(A) | 327 | 39.4 |
| 8(b)(4)(B) | 417 | 50.2 |
| 8(b)(4)(C) | 29 | 3.5 |
| 8(b)(4)(D) | 186 | 22.4 |
| Total cases 8(b)(7) | 273 | 100.0 |
| 8(b)(7)(A) | 20 | 7.3 |
| 8(b)(7)(B) | 26 | 9.5 |
| 8(b)(7)(C) | 229 | 83.9 |
| D. CHARGES FILED AGAINST UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS UNDER SEC. 8(e) | ||
| Total cases 8(e) | 26 | 100.0 |
- 1 A single case may include allegations of violations of more than one section of the act. Therefore, the
0 of 24 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out.
Reader’s notes
p. 197. Panel layout: the table is printed as four lettered sections (A-D), each set as two side-by-side panels sharing one set of column headings (stub + \"Number of cases showing specific allegations\" + \"Percent of total cases\"). The grid collapses this to a single 3-column panel; within each lettered section the left panel's rows are given first, then the right panel's. So in section A the rows 8(a)(3), 8(a)(4), 8(a)(5) are printed to the right of \"Total cases\"/8(a)(1)/8(a)(2), not beneath them; likewise 8(b)(3)-8(b)(7) in section B and the 8(b)(7) block in section C. The column headings are printed only once, in the header band of section A.\n\nSection lines: the centered all-caps lines \"A. CHARGES FILED AGAINST EMPLOYERS UNDER SEC. 8(a)\", \"B. ...\", \"C. ...\", \"D. ...\" are transcribed as label-only rows. In the scan the period after \"B\" and after \"SEC\" in the D line, and after \"SEC\" in the D heading, are not visible (they read \"B CHARGES\" and \"UNDER SEC 8(e)\"); they are rendered here with the periods on the assumption they dropped out in this 1-bit scan, consistent with the A and C lines.\n\nDecimal points: in the percent column the scan renders the decimal point as a blank gap for nearly every value (\"100 0\", \"10 6\", \"78 3\", \"60 9\", etc.), while the two sub-1 values print a visible point (\".4\", \".6\"). The values are transcribed with decimal points. This reading is confirmed arithmetically: e.g. 327/830 = 39.4, 229/273 = 83.9, 6,044/7,723 = 78.3, 16/3,608 = 0.4.\n\nFootnote markers: raised 1 and 2 precede the values they mark in the printed table (\"^1 7,723\", \"^2 7,723\", \"^1 100 0\"); per convention they are written after the value here.\n\nCrop: the footnote block is cut off by the bottom edge of the crop. Only the first line of footnote 1 is partly legible and it ends mid-sentence (\"... of the act. Therefore, the\"); the remainder of footnote 1 and all of footnote 2 (referenced by the 8(a)(1) row) are not on this image. The word read as \"section\" in that line could be \"subsection\" - the line is faint and clipped.\n\nThe scan drops the dots on several lowercase i's in the headings (\"showıng\", \"specıfıc\", \"allegatıons\"); normal spellings are used.
Source image
Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.