Record of Injunctions Petitioned for, or Acted Upon, Fiscal Year 1957

p. 192. The table continues past the bottom of this crop (the rows run in order of petition-filing date and stop at Dec. 6, 1955), so no footnote block is printed on this image; the footnote keyed by the raised "1" is not shown here. "(1)" in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column is a raised 1 inside parentheses standing alone as the cell's content (the standard "see footnote 1" filler), not a marker attached to a value; it appears in rows 13-CC-110, 8-CC-37, 2-CC-350, 2-CC-358/2-CD-114, 17-CC-38 and 2-CC-366. "Type of petition" is the statutory section 10(l). At this scan resolution the lowercase italic "l" in the parentheses is easily confused with the digit 1 (and in the 2-CC-350 row it reads almost like a 4); all thirteen cells are the same mark and are transcribed uniformly as "10 (l)". Terminal periods on month abbreviations and after "Co" drop out intermittently in this 1-bit scan (e.g. "Oct 25, 1956", "Nov 9, 1956", "Sept 21, 1956", "Aug 24, 1956", "Aug 8, 1956", "Horn & Hardart Baking Co )", "St Louis"); they are rendered here with the periods the original typesetting uses. These are punctuation only — no digits are affected. Possible misprints in the original, transcribed as printed: (a) row 2-CC-362, 363 names "Locals 976, 277" in the Union and Company column but the Board-decision column refers to "Locals 967 and Joint Council 67"; (b) row 13-CC-110's Board-decision cell reads "July 24, 1956, as to State empls. Aug. 30, 1955." — the 1955 date follows the 1956 date, and "State empls." is abbreviated as shown; (c) row 17-CC-38's company parenthesis closes after an interior period, "(Associated General Contractors of Omaha.)". Both "Temporary restraining order" sub-columns (Date issued, Date lifted) are dash rules in every row and are therefore empty throughout. A small ink artifact sits in the right margin beside the 2-CC-362 row and is not table content.

p. 193. Continuation page of Table 20; column headings are reprinted here, so they are given. No footnote block is printed under the table on this crop, so `footnotes` is empty even though several cells reference footnote 1. Footnote-reference cells: in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column, eleven cells hold only a raised parenthesized 1 — a stand-in for a value pointing at footnote 1 (printed on another page). Because there is no value for the marker to attach to, these are transcribed as the printed token "(1)" rather than with a caret. "Type of petition": the parenthetical is Section 10(l) — a lowercase letter l, which in this typeface is nearly identical to the digit 1. I read every cell in that column as "10 (l)". Scan quality: this is a 1-bit scan in which many abbreviation periods have dropped out. Where the intent is unambiguous I restored them ("Atlantis Investment Co.).", "Inc., Georgia Branch", "et al.", "(W. D. Wash.)"); where the period is simply absent in a date I left it as printed ("Mar 29, 1956" row 36-CC-48, 49; "Sept 14, 1956" and "Dec 26, 1956" in the Board-decision column; "Jan 10, 1957"; "Aug 24, 1956"; "Dec 12, 1956"). These are typographic details only and do not affect the values. Doubtful cells: row "36-CC-48, 49." company name reads "Central Dcck Co." in the scan; I transcribed "Central Dock Co." as the evident word. Row "2-CC-373" company is "Fedders-Quigan Corp." (the hyphen is an end-of-line break, joined). Trailing-period inconsistency in the last column is as printed: some entries end with a period, some ("June 7, 1956" for 36-CC-48, 49; "Settled") do not. Crop: the bottom row ("2-CC-388") sits flush against the lower edge of the image and the closing rule of the table is not visible, so the table may continue below the crop. The last row's visible cells are complete.

p. 194. Continuation page: no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 10 columns, read off the vertical rules: (0) case number stub, (1) respondent/case name, (2) a date, (3) statutory section ("10 (l)"), (4) and (5) two date columns that are dashed-out except for case 2-CC-339, (6) a date column, (7) a date column, (8) a date column, (9) a final date/disposition column. Many cells hold only a dash rule and are transcribed as "". Several cells in column 6 contain nothing but a small raised "1" inside parentheses, i.e. a reference to footnote 1 printed as "(¹)"; these are transcribed as "(1)" (rows 6-CC-119, 20-CC-106, 21-CC-231, 1-CC-161/163, 1-CC-136-145, 19-CC-89, 3-CC-57, 3-CC-53). Row 10-CC-213-215, 218-240, 243-250, column 6: after "(consent)" there is a small tick/apostrophe-like mark that may be a footnote marker or a printing artifact; it is not transcribed. The line "See footnotes at end of table." is printed below the table body; no numbered footnotes appear on this crop, so footnotes is empty and the actual footnote texts are on a later page. Other doubtful points: in row 2-CD-125, column 7 the second date is printed "Oct 9. 1956" (period where a comma is expected) and is given as "Oct 9, 1956"; the local number in that row's name reads "976-4". In row 1-CC-159, 160 the printed name has a space before the comma in "Iron Workers ,", normalized to "Iron Workers,"; "R. S Noonan" lacks a period after "S" as printed. In row 3-CC-53 the name ends "Booher Lumber Co , Inc.)" with no closing period, transcribed as "Booher Lumber Co, Inc.)". A stray curved pen/ink stroke runs through the lower right of the "(1)" column across rows 19-CC-89 through 3-CC-53 and through the bottom rule; it is not table content. Scan quality blurs some periods vs. commas in abbreviated month names (e.g. "Oct." vs "Oct"); these are transcribed as they appear but are low-confidence details.

p. 195. This is a continuation page of Table 20; no footnote block is printed on the crop, so `footnotes` is empty even though the body refers to markers 1, 2 and 3. Column structure: 10 columns. "Temporary restraining order" spans the two columns "Date issued" and "Date lifted"; the other eight headings are tall single headings repeated in both header levels. Footnote-marker cells: the "Date temporary injunction granted" column repeatedly holds a lone parenthesized superscript 1, transcribed as "(1)" (it is the whole cell content, not attached to a value). Row 2-CD-126 has a raised 3 after the date, transcribed "May 1, 1957^3". Rows "10-CC-255, 256,^2 12-CC-1, 2." and "10-CC-257-262, 264-266,^2 12-CC-4-12." carry a raised 2 inside the case-number string; in the second of these the comma before the raised 2 is faint and could be absent. Doubtful characters (1-bit scan, broken letterforms): - Last row, Case No.: the scan renders the middle letters as "14-CO-95, 14-OD-64"; C and O are indistinguishable at this resolution and the AFL-Electrical Workers entry is a CB/CC/CD trio, so it is transcribed "14-CB-400, 14-CC-95, 14-CD-64." - Abbreviation periods are inconsistently legible in the "Date petition for injunction filed" column. "Aug 21, 1956" (row 10-CC-257...), "Sept 4, 1956" (rows 2-CD-133 and 14-CB-400...) appear to lack the period, while "Sept. 4, 1956" (row 19-CC-91) shows one; they are transcribed as they appear, but a faint printed period cannot be ruled out in any of them. - Trailing periods inside "(Ketchikan Pulp Co.).", "(Howard Johnson's Inc.).", "(Diaz Drayage Co.)." are faint in the scan and are restored here on the strength of the spacing before the closing parenthesis. - Header word "restraining" is printed clearly but scans as "restraming"; "lifted" scans as "lrfted". Both are read as the obvious words. "Ready-Mixed" (row 17-CC-51, 52.) breaks across two printed lines at its own hyphen; the hyphen is retained as part of the compound rather than repaired away. Row 2-CD-133 has no entry in any of the six date columns after "Type of petition" — all are dash rules or blank. Dash rules ("------") throughout the date columns are transcribed as empty cells per instruction.

p. 196. Continuation page: the crop shows only body rows between horizontal rules, with no column headings and no footnote block, so header_rows and footnotes are empty. The grid has 10 printed columns (case number stub; party/company name; a first date; the statutory section; two mostly-empty date columns; a date column that carries most entries; another mostly-empty date column; a date column; and a final disposition column). Column 4 and column 5 are filled on one row only (32-CC-14, 15, 32-CD-1, 2.: "Sept. 24, 1956" and "Oct. 4, 1956"); column 7 is filled on one row only (21-CC-238: "Dec. 3, 1956"). All the long dash rules ("------------") are transcribed as "". Column 3: the glyph after "10 (" is a narrow vertical stroke that could read as lowercase "l" or as figure "1" in this 1-bit scan; because every case here is a CC/CD/CB injunction matter, I read it as Section "10 (l)" throughout. If the source convention is "10 (1)", every cell in that column changes uniformly. The "(1)" entries in column 7 (rows 35-CC-36, 8-CD-8, 3-CC-58, 15-CC-53, 3-CC-59/3-OD-22, 35-CC-38) are printed as a small raised parenthesized 1, i.e. a reference to footnote 1 standing as the whole cell value rather than a marker attached to a number; I transcribed them as "(1)". The footnote text itself is not on this crop. The scan drops many small periods. Abbreviation periods that the compositor clearly uses elsewhere on the page were restored where the dot is not visible: "(Class-Knit Co.)", "(Chief Textiles, Inc.)", "(Southern Service Co., Ltd.)", "(Davis-Fetch & Co.)", "Local No. 928", "Local No. 745", "(Associated Wholesale Grocery of Dallas, Inc.)", "(Matawan Undergarment Co.)", "(Sears, Roebuck & Co.)", and the "Sept." in "Sept. 21, 1956" (row 7-CC-49, column 3) and in "Sept. 24, 1956" (row 32-CC-14, column 5). The row label for 3-CC-59 reads "3-OD-22." in the scan; this is very likely "3-CD-22" (C read as O), but I left it as the characters appear. The 3-CC-59 name cell ends "& Co.)" with no visible closing sentence period, unlike the other name cells. A small isolated speck sits in the right margin beside the 3-CC-58 row, outside the table rules; it is a scan artifact, not data.

p. 197. Continuation page of Table 20 (caption carries "—Continued"); no footnote text is printed on this crop, so `footnotes` is empty even though footnote marker 1 is used in the body. The table continues past the bottom of the crop (the last row, 10-CC-294, 295, is the final one visible and its rule is at the page edge). Footnote-reference cells: in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column, six rows carry only a raised 1 inside parentheses (no date). I transcribed these as "(^1)" to keep the printed parentheses while marking the digit as a raised footnote reference, not a value; affected rows: 6-CC-125/6-CD-53; 2-CD-134, 138, 139; 11-CC-11, 12; 13-CC-134; 5-CC-70. "Type of petition" column: every row except the first reads as "10 (l)" — the glyph is a lowercase l (section 10(l) of the Act) but in this 1-bit scan it is nearly identical to the digit 1; the first row is clearly "10 (j)". Doubtful / possibly misprinted cells: - Row 8-CC-51-61, "Temporary restraining order / Date issued" = "Feb. 21, 1957" while "Date temporary injunction granted" = "Jan. 31, 1957"; a restraining order dated after the injunction is chronologically odd, and the issued date may be a misprint for "Jan. 21, 1957" (the petition-filed date). Transcribed as printed. - Row 4-CC-81-83, "Date temporary injunction granted": printed "Feb" with no visible period before "2, 1957"; likewise row 10-CC-283, "Date Board decision and/or order": "Feb 20, 1957." Periods may simply be lost in the scan; transcribed as seen. - Row 11-CC-11, 12: the union name is hyphenated across lines as "Associa-" / "ation", which joins to the non-word "Associaation"; I transcribed the evident intended word "Association". - Rows 2-CD-134 ("Revoli Trucking Corp )") and 12-CC-3 ("Biscayne Television Corp )"): a period after "Corp" is not visible before the closing parenthesis; transcribed without it. A short stray ink/pen stroke crosses the rule between the "Type of petition" and "Date issued" columns at the first body row; it is not type and was ignored. Leader dots after case numbers and dash rules ("-----") in empty cells were dropped per instructions.

p. 198. Continuation page: no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 10 columns, delimited by vertical rules: (0) case number stub, (1) case name, (2) date, (3) statutory section ("10 (l)"/"10 (j)"), then six further date/disposition columns; most rows carry values only in columns 6, 8 and 9 (0-indexed), with the rest filled by dash rules transcribed as "". A footnote line is printed below the bottom rule of the table but is almost entirely cut off by the crop (only the tops of a few characters, apparently beginning with a raised "1", survive). It could not be read, so footnotes is an empty list even though at least one footnote exists on the page. The raised "(1)" in column 6 of several rows is a footnote reference printed alone as the cell's entire content (no value accompanies it); it is transcribed as "(1)" rather than as a caret marker because there is no text for it to attach to. Periods after abbreviations drop out of this 1-bit scan in places. In rows 1-2 ("Feb 5, 1957", "Feb 7, 1957"), row 3 ("Feb 11, 1957") and row 7 (column 2 and column 4 read "Mai 6, 1957" / "Mar 6, 1957"), and in "Inc )." (row 1) and "Corp )." (row 9), the period is faint or absent on the image; I have transcribed the normal printed forms ("Feb.", "Mar.", "Inc.).", "Corp.).") on the assumption these are scan dropouts. Row 10's label prints the hyphen in "AFL-Teamsters" as a raised mid-dot in this scan; transcribed as a hyphen. Two ink/scan artifacts are present and were not transcribed: a diagonal pen stroke crossing column 4 beside row 2, and a small stray comma-like mark in the stub column below the "10-CC-290, 301, 302" label. Row 15's stub is printed as "5-CC-74" followed by leader dots, which have been dropped. Row 13's stub carries a trailing period as printed ("13-CC-135-137.").

p. 199. This is a continuation page of Table 20; the column headings are reprinted, so they are transcribed. No footnote texts are printed under the table on this crop (the markers ^1 and ^3 refer to notes carried at the end of the table on another page), so `footnotes` is empty. Column ambiguities and doubtful cells: - "Type of petition": every row prints what is almost certainly "10 (l)" (Section 10(l) of the Act), but in this typeface the lowercase "l" and the digit "1" are nearly identical; I transcribed all 16 as "10 (l)". - "Date temporary injunction granted": six rows (9-CC-94/9-CD-29; 13-CC-131; 3-CC-64/3-CD-26; 9-CC-96; 7-CC-58; 2-CC-411, 412) hold only a parenthesised raised "1", i.e. a bare footnote reference standing in place of a date. I wrote these as "(^1)" — the parentheses are printed, the digit is raised. - Row "2-CD-126 (amended to include 2-CD-140, 141)", column "Date petition for injunction filed": a small raised character follows "April 25, 1957". It reads as a "3" but could be a "2"; transcribed as "April 25, 1957^3". - Row "5-CC-77", column "Date injunction denied": printed "Apr. 29 1957 (no appeal)" with no visible comma between day and year, unlike every other date in the table; transcribed as printed. - Row "5-CC-76", column "Date temporary injunction granted": the mark between "10" and "1957" is blurred and could be read as a period; transcribed as the comma used in all other dates, "June 10, 1957". - Rows "39-CC-34, 35, 39-CD-24, 25, 30." and "9-CC-96": the closing abbreviations "et al )" and "Construction Co )" show a space before the parenthesis where a period is faint or dropped in the scan; transcribed as "et al.)" and "Co.)". - Rows "21-CC-258" and "2-CD-146" have dash rules in all action columns and no Board decision entry, so all six right-hand cells are empty. - Leader dots after the shorter case numbers (e.g. "13-CC-131 ..") were dropped per instruction. Dash rules ("------") in the restraining-order and dismissal columns were rendered as empty cells throughout.

p. 200. Continuation page: no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. Column count (10) was taken from the vertical rules: stub case number; union/company; date; the "10 (l)" column; five further date columns; and a final remarks column (the only entry in it is "Settled." on row 6-CC-132). Section column: the glyph in "10 (l)" is a lowercase "l" rather than the digit 1 — the two are near-identical in this face, but footnote 3 contrasts "10 (l) petition" with "10 (k) hearing", which settles it. Transcribed as "10 (l)" throughout. Standalone footnote references: four cells in column 7 contain only a parenthesised raised 1 with no value. These are written "(^1)" — the parentheses are printed and the 1 is the raised footnote marker. Footnote markers under the table are raised and partly broken in the scan; the second reads like a "3" and the third like an "8", but the sequence is plainly 1, 2, 3 and has been transcribed that way. Footnotes 2 and 3 are not referenced by anything on this crop — their anchors sit on an earlier part of the table. Stray mark: in the first row (5-CC-82), column 5, a small pen-like squiggle sits over the dash rule. It is an artifact on the scan, not printed content; the cell is empty. Wrapped case numbers ("2-CC-430, 431.", "14-CC-104, 105.", "2-CC-420, 2-CD-148.") are joined onto one line with their printed trailing periods kept. The union/company entries for 5-CC-82 and 6-CC-143 appear to carry no closing period, unlike the rest; transcribed as seen, but this is low-confidence at scan resolution. Row 4's company string reads "and Pilots and Rivers Joint Organizing Committee"; "Organiz-ing" was a line-break hyphen and has been repaired.