Record of Injunctions Petitioned for, or Acted Upon, Fiscal Year 1954

p. 187. Ten columns, two heading levels; "Temporary restraining order" spans the "Date issued"/"Date lifted" pair, and the other eight headings are tall single headings repeated in both levels. Footnote marker as cell content: in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column, eight rows (2-CC-230, 35-CC-22, 2-CC-246, 4-CC-43, 5-CC-29, 3-CC-26, 28, 29, and 4-CC-39) carry a raised "1" inside parentheses standing alone as the whole cell, i.e. a pointer to footnote 1 rather than a date. I transcribed these as "(1)". The footnote text itself is not on this crop — the table's bottom rule follows the last row with no footnote line beneath it, so footnote 1 must be printed elsewhere (the table appears to continue on the following page). `footnotes` is therefore empty. Ditto marks: "do" appears as the printed cell value (between leader dots) in the "Date petition for injunction filed" column for rows 5-CC-29, 5-CC-28, 30 and 1-CC-88; in the withdrawn/dismissed column for row 11-CC-3; and as "do." in the last column for row 4-CC-39. Leader dots dropped per instruction. "Type of petition": every row reads "10 (l)" (lowercase L, i.e. Sec. 10(l)) except row 2-CA-2554, 2907, where the letter is a "j" — consistent with that being the one CA (employer unfair-labor-practice) case in the list. The l/j distinction is small at this resolution but the glyph in that row clearly has a descender. Faded punctuation: this is a 1-bit scan and periods after abbreviations frequently drop out of the glyph while leaving their space. I restored them where the gap and the standard abbreviation make the reading unambiguous: "Assn." (rows 1, 3, 10), "Co." / "Inc." before a closing parenthesis (rows 2, 4, 12, 16), and the month abbreviations "Feb. 3, 1953" (row 11-CC-3), "Mar. 25, 1953" (24-CC-19), "Sept. 21, 1953" (24-CC-19) and "Dec. 17, 1953" (20-CD-33). "et al" in row 13-CC-5, 7 is left without a period, as printed. Two cells carry a parenthetical qualifier on a second printed line under the date, joined here into one cell: "Mar. 25, 1953 (consent)" (24-CC-19) and "Apr. 28, 1953 (consent)" (3-CC-27). Likewise the last column of 24-CC-14, 15, 16 reads "Jan. 16, 1953." with "(stip)." on the line below, joined as one cell. The "Date injunction denied" column is empty for all nineteen rows (dash rules or blanks only). Row 15 reads "AFL-Electrical Works, Locals 79, 181, 35, and 1261" — "Works" rather than "Workers" appears to be a misprint in the source (compare row 12, "AFL-Electrical Workers"); transcribed as printed. Stray ink: small specks sit in the "Date lifted" column of row 4-CC-37 and the "Date temporary injunction granted" column of row 11-CC-3, and a short mark crosses the dash rule in the "Date injunction denied" column of row 2-CC-230. These are scan artifacts over dash rules, not values; those cells are "".

p. 188. Continuation/right-hand panel of a table spread (file name indicates table 0 begun on p. 187 and continued here on p. 188): no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The leftmost cell on this page is the section-of-the-Act column ("10 (1)"); the case-identifying row labels almost certainly sit on the facing page, outside this crop. Seven ruled columns are present and every value has been placed under the rule it is printed between; most cells are leader-dash rules ("------"), transcribed as "". Footnote references: several cells contain nothing but a small raised "(1)" standing in place of a date. These are transcribed as (^1) — the raised 1 is a footnote marker, and the parentheses are printed around it. No footnote texts are printed within this crop (the area below the table's bottom rule is cut off, showing only the clipped tops of a line of type), so footnotes is empty. Doubtful area: in the band between the "Dec. 9, 1953" row (row 19) and the final row, a faint, broken line of leader dashes runs across all seven columns just above the solid dash line that carries "Aug. 14, 1953". I read that faint line as show-through / offset from the facing page rather than a separate table row, partly because other isolated faint specks appear elsewhere on the page (e.g., above the "July 14, 1953" row in columns 2-3, in column 5 opposite "June 15, 1954.", and in column 7 near the top and bottom), and partly because an entirely blank case row would be meaningless here. Only one "10 (1)" stub is legible in that band. If the faint line is in fact a printed row, then one all-blank row is missing from this transcription at position 20. Other individual cells worth flagging: row 8 column 6 is printed "Nov 17, 1953" and row 13 column 6 "Jan 22, 1954", both without the abbreviating period, and row 6 column 7 is "Aug 26, 1953." likewise — transcribed as printed. Row 14 column 7 reads "Sept. 17, 1954."; the year is slightly indistinct and could conceivably be 1953, which would fit better beside the "Oct. 26, 1953" in column 6. Typesetting that left no space after a period or comma ("Aug.10, 1953", "June15, 1954.") has been normalised to single spaces; no other wording was altered.

p. 189. This is a continuation page of Table 20 (a case-by-case list, not a numeric table); the table runs on past the bottom of the crop and no footnote texts are printed on this page, so `footnotes` is empty. The repeated entry "(1)" in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column is a parenthesised superscript numeral 1 — a reference to footnote 1, which is printed elsewhere (presumably at the end of the table); it is transcribed with the characters as printed rather than as a caret marker because the cell contains nothing but the reference. In the "Date petition for injunction filed" column, the 20-CC-90 row carries a ditto entry printed as dashes around "do", transcribed "do.". The scan is a coarse bitonal image and periods after abbreviated month names and company abbreviations ("Oct", "Nov", "Co", "Inc", "Assn", "Mfg") are frequently broken or invisible; each cell is transcribed with the punctuation I can actually see, so some printed periods may be missing (notably the stub heading "Case No", which may be printed "Case No."). The 6-CC-84, 87, 89, 90 case number wraps onto a second printed line ("90") and is joined into one label. For 14-CD-39 the "Date issued" cell holds two lines, "Oct. 12, 1953" and "(consent)", joined here; its "Date temporary injunction granted" cell and all later cells on that row are blank or dash rules. Columns 4-6 of 14-CD-39 and the last three columns of several rows are dash rules, rendered "". Row 2-CC-266 has a small stray caret/arrow mark in the left margin beside "Products Co , Inc )", which I read as a printing artefact and not part of the label.

p. 190. Continuation page: no column headings are printed on this crop, so header_rows is empty. The grid has 10 columns, read off the vertical rules: (1) case number stub, (2) union/respondent and company, (3) date charge filed, (4) section of the Act (and, where given, the district), then six unlabelled date columns. Only one entry falls in column 8 (the "Feb. 26, 1954" on the 7-CC-22, 7-CD-8 row); columns 5, 6, 9 and 10 are likewise sparsely filled, and all cells containing only a dash rule are transcribed as "". Periods: this is a 1-bit scan and many abbreviation periods drop out at the rendered resolution (the same abbreviation appears as both "Feb." and "Feb" on adjacent lines, and gaps such as "Assn , Local 996" / "Otis Massey Co , Ltd )" show where a dot was lost). I have restored the periods the typesetting implies (Jan., Feb., Mar., Apr., Co., Inc., Ltd., Assn., Corp., Empls., Phila., N.J.); "May" and "June" carry none. Trailing sentence periods in the last column are transcribed as seen: present on "Apr. 15, 1954.", "May 28, 1954.", "Apr. 13, 1954.", absent on "May 13, 1954". Footnote markers: six cells in column 7 hold nothing but a parenthesised raised 1; these are written "(^1)", keeping the printed parentheses. The case number on the 18th body row carries a raised 2 in parentheses and is written "2-CC-288^2". No numbered footnote text appears on this crop; the only line below the body is the continuation pointer "See footnotes at end of table.", which is not reproduced in footnotes because it carries no marker. Doubtful cells: the 5th body row's case number reads "39-CC-11" — the leading 3 is partly filled in, but Region 39 (Houston) fits Otis Massey Co. of Houston, so I read it as 39. Rows 6 and 7 both carry case number "16-CC-22" as printed (distinguished only by the district line "(La.)" versus "(Texas)" in column 4); this is not a transcription slip. The "(La.)" cell shows a gap where the period should be and is read as "La." The 19th body row shows a stray mark after "1290," in the local-union list, and the "Withdrawn" cell in that row has an ink speck above it; neither is transcribed. In rows 20-22 the section column reads "10 (j)" (descender visible), against "10 (l)" everywhere else, consistent with those being CB rather than CC cases.

p. 191. Crop is a continuation page ("—Continued"); it carries the column headings but the table is cut off at the bottom edge — the closing rule and any footnote block are not in this image, so `footnotes` is empty even though footnote marker 1 is cited in the body. Footnote-marker cells: in the "Date temporary injunction granted" column, five rows (2-CC-276, 1-CC-100, 2-CC-290, 2-CC-284, 2-CD-95, 96) hold only a parenthesised raised "1" and no date. These are rendered "(^1)" — the parentheses are printed, the 1 is superscript, and the referenced footnote text is not on this crop. "Type of petition": every entry is set as "10" followed by a parenthesised lowercase letter that reads as "l" (Section 10(l)); it is transcribed "10 (l)". For 16-CC-22 the cell runs onto a second line, "(Ark )", joined here as "10 (l) (Ark.)" — the abbreviation point after "Ark" is faint/unclear in the scan. Faint or dropped abbreviation points in the "Union and company" column: "(Boston Shipping Assn., Inc )." (1-CC-100), "(National Trucking Co )." (10-CC-64) and the "(Ark )" above print without a visible point after Inc / Co / Ark; a period has been supplied in each, as the surrounding rows all use "Inc." and "Co.". Row 16-CC-22 has no leader-dot rules at all in the six date columns (the other rows use dashed leaders for empty cells); all six are transcribed as empty. A stray ink speck sits in its "Date issued" cell and is not a value. Similar stray specks appear near "Withdrawn." for 1-CC-100 and in the last column of the 2-CC-290 block, and in the right margin beside 2-CC-290; none is a printed value. Stub label for the tenth row is printed on two lines, "19-CC-60," over "19-CB-311.", joined into one label. "11-CC-5, 6" and "2-CD-95, 96" each list two case numbers on one line. Last-column entries are printed with a closing period as transcribed ("May 10, 1954.", "Withdrawn.").

p. 192. The crop is the tail of a table continued from the preceding page: no column headings are printed on this image, so header_rows is empty. Column count (10) is taken from the nine vertical rules, which run the full height of the body and continue below the last row to the bottom rule. Columns 5 through 10 carry only dash rules (------) in most cells; those are transcribed as "". The only filled cells among them are: column 7 in row 5-CC-37, column 8 ("June 24, 1954") in row 20-CA-958, and column 10 ("Settled.") in row 5-CC-37. The exact column index of "(^1)" and of "June 24, 1954" rests on reading the positions of the rules between the dash segments; they sit in adjacent but different columns (the "(1)" is one column to the left of the "June 24, 1954" column), which I verified by counting four dash segments plus two filled cells in the first row against five dash segments plus one filled cell in the second. Column 7 of row 5-CC-37 holds a parenthesised raised "1" standing alone as the whole cell, i.e. a pointer to footnote 1 rather than a value; it is written "(^1)". Footnote 2 ("Consolidated with 2-CC-287.") is printed under the table but its marker appears on an earlier part of the table, above this crop. Hyphens broken at line ends were repaired: "Engineer- ing" to "Engineering" in the 5-CC-37 label and "Wai- alua" to "Waialua" in the 37-CC-3 label. The wide typesetting space in "June 8, 1954" (column-aligned day) was closed to a single space. Section entries read "10 (l)" (lowercase L) in rows 5-CC-37 and 37-CC-3 and "10 (j)" in row 20-CA-958; l/j are legible and distinct in the scan.