Record of injunctions petitioned for under sec. 10 (j) and 10 (l) during fiscal year 1949

p. 263. Crop is cut off at the bottom: the last row (15-CC-10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) sits at the very edge, and no footnote block is visible, so `footnotes` is empty even though markers 1, 2, 4 and 5 are referenced in the body. The table very likely continues with more rows and the footnote texts on the following page. Ten columns: Case No. | Union and company | Date petition for injunction filed | Type of petition | Temporary restraining order: Date issued | Temporary restraining order: Date lifted | Date temporary injunction granted | Date injunction denied | Date injunction proceedings withdrawn or dismissed | Date of Board decision and/or order. Footnote markers: raised digits printed BEFORE a date have been moved behind a caret after the date, per instruction — "4 July 9, 1948" (17-CC-2, Date issued), "5 Sept. 22, 1948" (30-CC-4, Date injunction denied), "4 Sept 14, 1948" (2-CC-62, Date temporary injunction granted), "4 Oct. 15, 1948" (2-CC-50, 51, same column). Cells whose entire content is a parenthesised raised digit are written "(1)" / "(2)" with no caret, since there is no value to attach them to; they occur in the Date of Board decision and/or order column (17-CC-2, 2-CC-59, 2-CC-44, 20-CC-30) and the Date temporary injunction granted column (2-CC-44, 8-CC-4, 2-CC-64, 65, 66). Column placement checks against the rules: "Nov. 6, 1948" in row 17-CC-2 and "Sept. 22, 1948^5" in row 30-CC-4 are in Date injunction denied; "July 15, 1948" (5-CB-14), "Apr. 1, 1949" (2-CC-44) and "Feb. 7, 1949" (20-CC-30) are in Date injunction proceedings withdrawn or dismissed. This is a 1-bit scan in which light punctuation partly drops out; abbreviation periods in the "Union and company" column have been restored where the letter spacing clearly shows one was set (e.g. printed "Corp , et al" transcribed "Corp., et al."). Specific doubtful spots: 8-CC-4's label reads "Oil Workers. Loc 346" on the page — the mark after "Workers" looks like a period where a comma would be expected, and "Loc" has no visible period; transcribed as seen. Dates are likewise given as seen, so the inconsistent month abbreviations are intentional and may be scan dropout rather than typesetting: "Sept 14, 1948" (2-CC-62) and "Sept 16, 1948" (6-CC-17) and "Oct 27, 1948" (15-CC-10 ...) show no period, while the same months are printed "Sept." and "Oct." elsewhere. Case numbers are letterspaced in the original (e.g. "2-C C-59") and have been closed up. Where a case number wraps, the second line ends in a single period ("CD-18.", "14, 15.") that reads as a leader remnant rather than sentence punctuation; those trailing periods were dropped. Two stray specks appear in row 17-CC-2 — a small mark below "10 (l)" in Type of petition and a dot at the left of the dash rule in Date temporary injunction granted — and were treated as scan noise, not as footnote markers.

p. 264. Structure: this crop is a continuation page of a case-by-case listing (Section 10(l) injunction proceedings); no column headings are printed on it, so header_rows is empty. Counting the vertical rules gives 10 columns: (0) case number stub, (1) name of case/party, (2) first date, (3) the statutory-section column that reads "10 (l)" with leader dots in every row, then five further columns, the last four of which carry the parenthesized footnote references and the later dates. The table ends at a double rule at the foot of the crop and no footnote text is printed below it, so footnotes is empty; the markers (1), (2), (6) therefore refer to notes printed elsewhere (presumably at the end of the table on a later page). Empty columns: columns 4 and 5 (0-indexed, i.e. the two columns immediately right of the "10 (l)" column) are dash-ruled ("------") in all 16 rows of this crop, so every cell in them is "". They are kept because the column rules are clearly printed. Footnote markers: cells whose entire content is a raised parenthesized numeral are transcribed literally as "(1)", "(2)", "(6)" — they stand alone and are not attached to a value, so no caret form is used. Where a small raised digit precedes a date, it is moved behind a caret: row 19-CC-12 col 7 is printed "⁶ Oct. 13, 1949" -> "Oct. 13, 1949^6"; row 8-CC-7 col 8 is "¹ Oct. 24, 1949" -> "Oct. 24, 1949^1"; row 9-CC-23 col 8 is "¹ Oct.14, 1949" (no space after the point as printed) -> "Oct. 14, 1949^1". Punctuation uncertainty: abbreviation periods are systematically faint or dropped out in this scan. "Co", "Oct", "Feb" and personal initials repeatedly show a blank gap where a point belongs (e.g. "Lumber Co )", "Oct 29, 1948", "Feb 3, 1949", "Oct 31, 1949", "Al J Co , Inc", "W J , Co"). Because the gap itself is evidence of an unresolved point, these were transcribed with the period present, and the spurious space before the closing parenthesis/comma was removed. The internal punctuation of two party names is the least certain: "(Schneider, Al J. Co., Inc.)" (row 9-CC-21) and "(Camlin, W. J., Co.)" (row 8-CC-7). Suspected misprint: row 8-CC-7, column 1 reads "Electical Workers, Local 688, AFL" on the page — the "r" of "Electrical" is absent in the image. Transcribed as seen; it is either a printing error or a dropout in the scan. Other: row 12 of the body, "Spokane Building and Trades Council, et al AFL" — "et al" is printed without a following point and apparently without a comma before "AFL"; transcribed as seen. Row 21-CD-19 has a faint stray mark in column 7 (between "June 16, 1949" and the right-hand dates); it is an artifact, not a value, so that cell is "". Line-end hyphens were repaired where the word is genuinely broken ("Westing-house" -> "Westinghouse", "Em-ployees" -> "Employees", "Elec-trical" -> "Electrical"); the hyphens in the genuine compounds "Pettus-Bannister" and "Juneau-Spruce" were kept. Multi-line case numbers were joined into a single stub ("36-CC-1, 2, 3, 36-CD-1, 2, 3" and "1-CC-22, 23, 35, 36, 37, 38."); the trailing point on the latter is printed. The "(l)" in "10 (l)" is a lowercase letter L (Section 10(l) of the Act), not the digit 1.