NLRB Stats Archive

NLRB Stats Archive › Annual Reports › FY1936 › Analysis of charges filed

Analysis of charges filed

printed as Table 3 · source page 40 · nlrb1936_p0040_t0

Number of casesSubsections of section 8 involved"Other" analyzed
Number of cases123451 and 31 and 51, 3, and 51, 2, and 31, 2, 3, and 5Other11 and 21 and 41, 2, and 51, 3, and 41, 2, 3, and 41, 3, 4, and 51, 2, 3, 4 and 51, 4, and 5
Board22222
Region:
16363154824291186544
2119119268116933302712982213
323236171743103321
4777714463829257646222
524241120361024171312
62929321131367122
7171731227315116312
8343491912138247232
930301121114826428341
108888156733640161168731111
11313113171176744281241
122626214176117112
13515113384261911843624
1415156122711422
153232528172114114211
16222231521477411211
17303092037124684121
181111175422122
19404013322012696522
20222241961323311
2179791338432731831028
Total865865197594214053161851357946104223222954271

Download this table (CSV)

267 of 307 figures sit in a row or column sum that works out. 2 cells break a sum: 'Total', column 7: prints 405, rows 'Board' to '21' add to 400; 'Total', column 15: prints 32, rows 'Board' to '21' add to 33.

Reader’s notes

p. 40. 22 columns: stub, "Number of cases", 11 columns under "Subsections of section 8 involved", and 9 columns under "\"Other\" analyzed". The stub has no printed heading, so the stub cell is empty in both heading levels; "Number of cases" is a tall heading spanning both levels and is repeated. Row labels: the region rows are printed "1." through "21." followed by leader dots; "Region:" is a section line with no values. Empty body cells are printed as dash rules. Verification: every column was summed against its printed total. "Number of cases" (865), "1" (865), "2" (197), "3" (594), "4" (21), "1 and 3" (316), "1 and 5" (185), "1, 3, and 5" (135), "1, 2, and 3" (79), "1, 2, 3, and 5" (46), "Other" (104) and all nine "Other analyzed" columns except "1 and 2" reconcile exactly as transcribed. Two discrepancies remain, both in cells I could not resolve at this scan resolution: 1. Column "5": the rows as transcribed sum to 400, against the printed total 405. The shortfall sits in exactly two rows. Row 12, column "5" is transcribed 17, but that row's mutually exclusive combination columns give 11 ("1 and 5") + 7 ("1, 3, and 5") = 18. Row 21, column "5" is transcribed 43, but its combinations give 31 ("1 and 5") + 8 ("1, 3, and 5") + 8 ("1, 2, and 5") = 47. Using 18 and 47 would make the column sum to the printed 405 exactly. I transcribed the glyphs as I read them (17 and 43); these may be misprints, or 7/8 and 3/7 confusions on my part at this resolution. 2. Row 12, column "1 and 2" (under "Other analyzed") is transcribed 2, but that row's "Other" count is 1 and its column "2" value is 2 (= 1 from "1, 2, and 3" + 1), both of which imply 1; my column sum is 33 against the printed total 32. The paper is speckled/smudged in the "Other analyzed" panel around rows 12-15, so this cell is doubtful and may read 1. The "1" in the "1 and 4" column in the rows 1-2 area is placed on row 2 (row 2's "Other" = 8 = 2 + 2 + 1 + 3; row 1's "Other" = 4 is fully accounted for by the 4 under "1 and 2"), and the column total of 2 is then satisfied by rows 2 and 10.

Source image

Source page 40 of NLRB FY1936 annual report
Source: NLRB Annual Report FY1936, p. 40.

Source data: U.S. NLRB Annual Reports (public domain). Reconstruction by NLRB Stats Archive. Read by claude-opus-5 (effort max, prompt extract_v1) from the 300-dpi scan; stitched by page. Updated October 2026.